The life of Graham
By BARRY DAVIS
01/22/2013 23:22
‘A Liar’s Autobiography’ is a documentary tribute to the late Monty Python member.
A liar's autobiography 370 Photo: Courtesy PR
As any comedian will tell you, timing is of paramount importance when delivering
a punch line or, in the case of the Monty Python team, occasionally leaving your
audience hanging, waiting for the punch line that never comes.
Graham
Chapman’s ability to deliver immaculately weighted material, in deadpan fashion,
and at just the right – or wrong – moment was definitively proven when he died
in 1989, on the eve of the celebrations lined up for the Python gang’s 20th
anniversary.
Chapman’s sad but peerlessly timed shuffle off this mortal
coil, at the age of just 48, was marked by the first eulogy ever delivered live
on BBC television, in which fellow Python John Cleese stunned an audience
comprising, besides the other surviving Pythons, a veritable who’s who of the
British comedy elite, by merrily and lovingly lambasting Chapman.
Ben
Timlett, Jeff Simpson and Bill Jones – the latter is the son of original Python
member Terry Jones – have created their own salute to the late comedian in an
intricately crafted animation work entitled, in typically dubious manner, A
Liar’s Autobiography: The Untrue Story of Monty Python’s Graham Chapman. The
film is on the roster of this year’s British Film Festival which kicks off on
January 31 and will run at cinematheques around the country – including Tel
Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, Sderot and Herzliya – until February 10.
The
three directors invested significant effort in putting together not only
something which they feel is a fitting tribute to the late great actor, but also
a work which they believe Chapman would have applauded himself.
“The film
is really Graham’s own work – his writing and his humor,” states Simpson. “The
good thing is that people who knew Graham recognize Graham in the film, and say
‘yes, that’s Graham, that’s how he was.’ We also worked closely with Graham’s
partner of 25 years, David Sherlock.”
Mind you, the directors had to make
sure they had all the many facets of Chapman’s personality and abilities
covered.
“There were many different Grahams,” Simpson continues. “There
was the actor and comedian, there was the writer, the doctor [Chapman studied
medicine at Cambridge University] and the homosexual – all these different
characters that he was in real life. People recognize that in the
film.”
The quest to leave no trait or mannerism untouched, as far as
possible, led to the directors adopting a multipronged approach to the creative
process.
“That’s why we used 14 different animation styles in A Liar’s
Autobiography,” explains Simpson, “because we are representing all the different
aspects of Graham with different visuals.
That means there’s always
something fresh coming at the audience, because we used different styles to
represent different sections of his life.”
Bearing in mind Chapman’s and
the Pythons’ irreverent take on life, and their no-holds-barred take on what
could be laughed at, A Liar’s Autobiography is anything but a fawning
representation of Chapman and his work.
“The John Cleese eulogy comes up
at the end of the film,” continues Simpson, “and it really sums up our approach
because John’s words in that speech were: ‘anything for Graham apart from
mindless good taste.’ We certainly weren’t aiming for mindless good taste in our
film.”
Although the Monty Python’s Flying Circus TV series ended almost
four decades ago, and the team’s last movie, The Meaning of Life, came out a
full 30 years ago, the sextet’s impious brand of humor continues to inform the
cultural mindset of the average Brit.
“They are the comedy group everyone
refers to,” notes Timlett. “They are the most iconic comedy group.”
“The
expressions the Pythons used are part of everyday language,” adds Simpson. “As
soon as you say something like ‘no one expects the Spanish Inquisition’ [taken
from a popular Python sketch from the second TV series] people recognize that.
But it is interesting that all the Pythons have gone on to become famous for
other things as well. So, for instance, if Michael Palin walks down the street
he gets asked about his travel programs.”
Chapman was also highly active
following the breakup of the Python team and, says Timlett, probably sparked a
process of Stateside recognition for the British comedic gang.
“Graham
was actually the first Python to move to the States, and he appeared on all
sorts of chat shows and game shows, like Celebrity Squares,” Timlett explains,
“so Americans got to know him, and later the rest of the Pythons.”
That
was indisputably proven to be the case when the team, with support from Carol
Cleveland, who appeared in Python sketches whenever the acting services of a
real woman were required – the Pythons often appeared in drag in ludicrously
camped up female roles – and musician Neil Innes, put on a run of sketch-based
shows at the Hollywood Bowl in 1982. That led to the release of a movie called
Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl which included Chapman in an
impressively athletic role in the One Man Wrestling sketch.
However,
while Cleese, Palin, Jones, Eric Idle and Terry Gilliam have all gone on to do
great things in acting and directing, and in the documentary field, Chapman’s
premature demise obviated a continued post-Python career.
“Part of the
idea behind this film was just to remind people of Graham, and give him an
opportunity to step back onto the spotlight, even though he’s dead,” says
Simpson.
“This is very much a Graham Chapman film. It is not about Monty
Python,” notes Timlett. “It is based on his writing and he stars in the
film.
The other Pythons just play other roles in it. That is something we
sort of battled with when we set out on this project, because there is always
the weight of expectation, of the Pythons getting back together
again.”
Simpson says that he, Timlett and Jones were determined to keep
to the Chapman side of the creative tracks.
“The fact that we’ve made
this as a small independent film, where we’ve had the final editorial say, was
important. That meant we could keep it close to Graham’s original writing. I
think that if we’d made this through a big Hollywood studio the studio would
have demanded that the film [be] a kind of Monty Python’s greatest hits. We
definitely didn’t want to go down that road.
We often tease the audience
with Python references, but this film is about Graham and his work.”
For
more information about the British Film Festival:
www.ukfilmisrael. britishcouncil.org and the respective cinematheques.