LONDON – The British government said on Monday that it does not support calls
for a retraction of the Goldstone Report after its lead author distanced himself
from the report’s main allegations.
In an opinion piece in Friday’s
Washington Post, Judge Richard Goldstone indicated that Israel had not
deliberately targeted civilians or committed war crimes during Operation Cast
Lead two winters ago.
Editorial: Goldstone's example
Ya'alon urges UN to retract Goldstone Report
“Justice Goldstone has not made such a call [to
retract the report], and he has not elaborated on his views surrounding the
various other allegations contained in the report, allegations which we firmly
believe require serious follow- up by the parties to the conflict,” a Foreign
Office spokesman told The Jerusalem Post
on Monday night.
government said that while Goldstone’s acknowledgment was important, his was not
the only report on the 22-day conflict.
“Allegations of breaches of
International Humanitarian Law made against all parties to the Gaza conflict are
not limited to the Goldstone Report and have arisen from certain other credible
organizations. We firmly believe that any and all such allegations must be met
with credible and independent investigations by the parties to the conflict,”
the spokesman said.
Responding to Goldstone’s claim that if he’d “known
then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different
document,” the spokesman said it was the report that set up a process that
allowed for clarity and accountability into the conflict.
Goldstone makes clear in his recent comments that the Goldstone Report would
have looked differently if it had been produced now, on the basis of fresh
evidence released by a committee of independent experts, tasked to follow-up on
the Goldstone Report. This latest insight into the events surrounding the Gaza
conflict have come about because of the process that was set in train by his
The Foreign Office spokesman pointed out that
other than conceding that Israel had not targeted civilians deliberately,
Goldstone did not elaborate on other allegations; hence Britain’s belief that
these allegations be investigated independently.
“This is absolutely
consistent with our longstanding policy calling for independent investigations,”
he said. “Justice Goldstone does not elaborate on his views on the
various other allegations made against Israel in his report and does not call
for its retraction. We continue to believe that it is important these
allegations are investigated independently.”
The Board of Deputies of
British Jews welcomed Goldstone’s recantation, saying it accorded with the
conclusions of Col. Richard Kemp, a former commander of British forces in
Afghanistan, concerning IDF measures to avoid civilian casualties “even though
Hamas was at the same time deliberately putting civilians in harm’s
The Board added that Goldstone’s op-ed piece “reinforces Israel’s
right to self-defense” and notes that “Israel, like any sovereign nation, has
the right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against attacks from
abroad and within.... We would call on those who were so quick to use the report
as a stick to beat Israel, now to acknowledge publicly that they were mistaken.”