'Israel was right to act on inconclusive evidence. This is war, not a court of law'

By
October 25, 2007 11:06
'Israel was right to act on inconclusive evidence. This is war, not a court of law'

hot potato 224. (photo credit: )

New! on JPost.com: The Hot Potato This is your chance to voice your opinion. We've chosen a controversial / interesting entry that appeared on our site (talkback, blog, etc…) and we want to know what you have to say about it. TODAY'S HOT POTATO: Taken from article: Images show Syrian reactor hit by IAF Talkback #: 19 Talkbacker: David Samson, Toronto, Canada Text: The evidence [that Syria was indeed building a nuclear reactor with help from North Korea] is nowhere near conclusive. What's important, however, is that Israel was right to act on inconclusive evidence. They are at war, not in a court of law What do you think? The ball is in your court now. Click here to respond Previous Hot Potatos


Related Content

Supreme Court President Asher Grunis
August 28, 2014
Grapevine: September significance

By GREER FAY CASHMAN

Israel Weather
  • 14 - 25
    Beer Sheva
    14 - 22
    Tel Aviv - Yafo
  • 13 - 21
    Jerusalem
    14 - 22
    Haifa
  • 19 - 31
    Elat
    15 - 28
    Tiberias