Organization slams ‘Time' breastfeeding cover
05/17/2012 00:41
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine says there is no evidence that long-term breastfeeding is harmful to child, mother.
'Time' magazine breastfeeding cover Photo: ‘Time’ magazine
An international organization of physicians who specialize in breastfeeding
medicine has condemned Time magazine for its cover photo of a woman standing
with her nearly-four-year-old son and breastfeeding him.
However, the
500-member Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (ABM) – whose president is Prof.
Arthur Eidelman, former chairman of pediatrics at the Shaare Zedek Medical
Center – says there is no evidence that long-term breastfeeding is physically or
psychologically harmful to the child or the mother.
The New York-based
academy said that Time’s provocative cover photograph, titled “Are you mom
enough?” has triggered widespread and damaging misinformation about biological
norms for breastfeeding.
“All major medical organizations recommend about
six months of exclusive breastfeeding,” Eidelman said. “Together with the World
Health Organization, American Academy of Pediatrics, and US Surgeon’s General
Call to Action, the ABM recommends that breastfeeding should be continued
through infancy and beyond.”
Eidelman, a veteran expert in neonatology,
continued that “claims that breastfeeding beyond infancy is harmful to mother or
infant have absolutely no medical or scientific basis. Indeed, the more
salient issue is the damage caused by modern practices of premature
weaning.
“Human milk contains nutrients, antibodies, and immunemodulating
substances that are not present in infant formula or cow’s milk. Longer
breastfeeding duration is further associated with reduced maternal risks of
breast cancer, ovarian cancer, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and heart
attack.”
Eidelman told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday that the magazine
article actually had very little material on breastfeeding. It focused on
a technique of child-rearing called “attachment parenting,” which has been
promoted by The Baby Book coauthor Dr. William Sears, who encourages parents to
keep their infants in constant bodily contact by sleeping with the child in the
same bed or room, wearing a baby sling or letting the child decide when to stop
breastfeeding even if he or she already talks and can ask for the
breast.
The magazine cover, which Eidelman called “one of the most
obnoxious things I have ever seen,” has instead “focused on unfounded
accusations that both breastfeeding and attachment parenting adversely affect
child development. In fact, multiple studies have demonstrated that sensitive
parenting and secure attachment are major predictors of long-term mental health
and well-being.
“If there is ‘abuse,’” he continued, “it is Time’s
inappropriate use of the mother-infant nursing dyad as a come-on for generating
reader interest. Ideally, Time magazine should have featured a photograph of
breastfeeding that would have supported the concept of breastfeeding as both the
cultural and biological norm. However, by using a staged, provocative picture of
an atypical situation, Time chose to generate controversy for commercial ends at
the potential expense of well-accepted public health recommendations,”
Eidelman said.
He said that Sear is “extreme, not mainstream” in his
views.
Asked whether children suffer psychological damage from
breastfeeding even at age three or four or more – whether some Electra complex –
the mother-child equivalent of the Oedipus complex – could develop, Eidelman
said that “nobody can do a controlled study. We will never see a prospective,
randomized controlled study on this. But we do not know of any pathology of
physical or psychological damage. I know of women who breastfed their
children until the age of two or three; one of my daughters did it up to age
three. Most children are not interested breastfeeding that long, even if
the mother is.”
He also hasn’t seen any difference in extended
breastfeeding between the secular and the modern Orthodox or haredi sectors,
said Eidelman, who is modern Orthodox. “There is disagreement among Bible
scholars whether the matriarchs breastfed their babies for two or four years,”
he added.
Long-term breastfeeding cannot be relied upon for
contraception, he said, as lactation amenorrhea (a halt in menstruation because
of breastfeeding) may be prevented only if a mother breastfeeds many times a day
and not once or twice as is done at older ages, Eidelman said. In any case, most
religious women have another child a few years after the previous one, and when
pregnant, they don’t have enough milk to breastfeed regularly.
The ABM is
a global organization of physicians dedicated to the promotion, protection and
support of breastfeeding and human lactation through education, research and
advocacy. An independent, self-sustaining, international physician
organization and the only organization of its kind, Eidelman said, ABM’s mission
is to unite members of various medical specialties through physician education,
expansion of knowledge in breastfeeding science and human lactation,
facilitation of optimal breastfeeding practices, and encouragement of the
exchange of information among organizations. It also promotes the development
and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines.