MANCHESTER, New Hampshire – After winning a resounding victory in the firstin-
the-nation Republican presidential primary held here Tuesday night, Mitt Romney
gave a speech that focused on one thing: US President Barack
RELATED:Mitt Romney ‘open to examining’ Pollard issue
Romney’s words indicate that he sees the main battle as one
between himself and the Democratic leader, rather than his competitors for the
Republican nomination, and they outlined the arguments he is likely to use in a
Among them was a critique of Obama’s stance towards
Romney received 39 percent of the New Hampshire vote, on top of
the eight-ballot margin by which he prevailed in the Iowa caucuses last week.
Ron Paul finished second with 23% of the vote, Jon Huntsman third with 17% and
Newt Gingrich fourth with 10%. Rick Santorum, who narrowly lost in Iowa, failed
to generate enough momentum to give him more than 9% in New Hampshire, and Rick
Perry received just 1%.
No Republican who has not been an incumbent
president has won both states, and Romney now heads to South Carolina, which
votes next on January 21, as the dominant front-runner.
He was leading in
polls taken there before the New Hampshire primary results came in, in some
cases by double digits.
Andrew Smith, associate professor of political
science at the University of New Hampshire, said Romney’s win in the Granite
State “give[s] him tremendous momentum in South Carolina, make[s] him likely the
winner of South Carolina, and if that happens, he’s all but the nominee. He’ll
be the de facto nominee.”
He explained, “There’s only one campaign that
has a significant amount of money, and that is the Romney
They’re the only campaign that is really organized in other
states. And Republicans... tend to pick the person who finished second in the
previous nomination contest, and I think by most reasonable analyses, Mitt
Romney really finished second in 2008.”
Though Gingrich benefitted from a
recent $5 million contribution to a super PAC that supports him from long-time
friend Sheldon Adelson – the Las Vegas casino mogul and Netanyahu confidant –
Romney’s campaign announced Wednesday that it had raised $24m. in the last
quarter, bringing his total contributions for the year to $56m.
speech Tuesday night certainly implied that he sees his chief competitor as the
man who occupies the White House, not the other candidates for the GOP
nomination, despite the fact that 48 states have yet to vote. As such, the
content served as an unveiling of the line of attack he could take against
“His case will be that the Obama presidency has failed to deal
with our economic challenges, that Obama is in over his head, and that he
[Romney] has the know-how and experience to get the job done,” assessed Thomas
Mann, a political expert with the Washington- based Brookings Institution, based
on Romney’s remarks.
Romney’s emphasis on the country’s poor economic
performance and the need to restore optimism and self-confidence left little
room for international issues, which are expected to play a smaller role in this
election than in many others.
But he did take advantage of those themes
to accuse Obama of apologizing for the US and weakening its place in the
“Internationally, President Obama has adopted an appeasement
strategy. He believes America’s role as leader in the world is a thing of the
past. I believe a strong America must – and will – lead the future,” Romney
declared. “He apologizes for America; I will never apologize for the greatest
nation in the history of the earth.”
In his speech, Romney mentioned only
one foreign country by name, and that was Israel.
His reference indicated
that he sees tensions between Israel and the US over the course of the Obama
administration providing an opening for him to score political
“He criticizes our friends like Israel. I will always stand with
our friends,” Romney said to loud applause from the supporters who turned out to
celebrate his primary victory. But the Obama campaign pushed back against
“If Mitt Romney wants to talk about the State of Israel,
he should think about consulting with Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny
Ayalon... or Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak,” said a campaign spokesperson,
referring to Ayalon’s statement that “We have not had any better friend than
President Obama,” and Barak’s recent comment that “I can hardly remember a
better period of support.”
The campaign official also pointed to a
Washington Post article last year dismissing the idea that the president has
apologized for US actions.
“The claim that Obama repeatedly has
apologized for the United States is not borne out by the facts, especially if
his full quotes are viewed in context,” the newspaper reported after an
extensive review of his remarks.
Obama himself has in the past rejected
the appeasement characterization, responding when asked about it: “Ask Osama bin
Laden and the 22 out of 30 top al-Qaida leaders who’ve been taken off the field
whether I engage in appeasement.”
Large numbers of Republicans say they
strongly support Israel, and many primary voters cited the issue as among the
reasons why they have been upset with Obama’s stewardship of the
In addition to the potential appeal of his statement to
Republicans, Mann said Romney’s statement on Israel was also an attempt to court
Jewish voters, a constituency that is traditionally overwhelmingly Democratic,
but one the Republicans hope to make inroads with this November.
an automatic Republican line – one based on the GOP belief that they can
increase their support among American Jews in the 2012 election. I doubt such a
line will help garner more votes, but it may help with fundraising,” Mann