United Nations Security Council 311 (R).
(photo credit:ERIC THAYER / Reuters)
UNITED NATIONS - There is little chance that the UN Security Council will impose tough new sanctions on Iran anytime soon, despite a new UN report expected this week to contain evidence suggesting Iran wants atomic weapons.
The reason for this, Western diplomats say, is the reluctance of Tehran's traditional sympathizers China and Russia, which have the power to veto any council resolution, to sanction Iran's oil and gas sectors.
RELATED:Barak on Iran: Diplomacy is preferred Iranian cleric: Israeli military threats 'empty propaganda'
As a result, it will be hard to get anything out of the UN that is tougher than the last round of Iran sanctions passed in June 2010.
"The reality is that a new substantive step forward on sanctions will be very difficult," a senior Western diplomat said on condition of anonymity.
"The last set of sanctions were very substantive, and essentially the
next stage would be to go into the oil and gas sector," he said. "If you
get into the oil and gas sector, then obviously there will be
opposition from China in particular, but also from Russia. More so
China depends heavily on oil exports from Iran, the world's fifth biggest crude exporter, to fuel its growing economy.
The report by the UN International Atomic Energy Agency, due out later
this week, may strengthen suspicions that Tehran is seeking to develop
the capability to make atomic bombs but stop short of explicitly saying
that it is doing so, diplomats said.
The IAEA report will arrive weeks after the United States accused Tehran
of plotting to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to Washington.
Although Iran vehemently denied the allegation, the furor revived
speculation that a new UN sanctions resolution against Tehran might be
on the cards.
But US hopes for fifth sanctions resolution by the 15-nation UN Security
Council against Iran appear unrealistic, not least because many
countries are skeptical about the US plot allegations.Power plants or weapons?
Tehran maintains that its nuclear energy program is simply to provide
energy and has ignored UN demands to halt its uranium enrichment, which
could produce fuel for nuclear power plants or weapons.
Four sets of UN sanctions passed since 2006 have hit Iran's nuclear and
missile industries and people linked to them. They have also targeted
Iranian banks and other firms while steering clear of Iran's energy
Although Moscow and Beijing backed all four rounds of UN sanctions they
did so reluctantly and only after working hard to dilute the measures.
One diplomat said the combination of US, European Union and UN sanctions
and sabotage operations like the Stuxnet computer virus that
temporarily hobbled Iran's enrichment program have succeeded in slowing
Tehran's nuclear progress.
If the UN Security Council does not act, diplomats say, the United
States and its European allies will likely pursue unilateral national
sanctions outside the United Nations.
It may be possible for the Security Council to add a few more names of
Iranian individuals and entities linked to the UN blacklist of those
facing travel bans and asset freezes, though Western diplomats say such
moves would be symbolic.
"The UN is important because it's the international community," a
diplomat told Reuters. "But you're not going to stop Iran's nuclear
program with lowest common denominator sanctions by the UN Security
"The EU, the US and others will have to wield the sledgehammer with
national sanctions and drag the UN Security Council after them," he
Russia has pushed for new negotiations with Tehran and is attempting to
revive a stalled nuclear-fuel-swap deal that Iran accepted in October
2009 but later backed away from.
Russia and China are also keen to revive negotiations between Iran and
the five permanent Security Council members and Germany, even though
five years of fitful talks have led nowhere.
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin