Shula Zaken, former prime minister Ehud Olmert’s close aide, broke down in tears
on the witness stand as she testified Wednesday on behalf of the state against
her brother, Yoram Karshi, in the Tax Authority corruption scandal.
Zaken and Karshi are among eight suspects who have been charged in the affair.
However, Zaken’s trial will be held in Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court while the
trial of the other seven is already under way in the Central District Court in
Rishontours: Risby-Raz says no chance of fair trial
Zaken implicated in Rishon Tours case
Karshi and another businessman, Kobi Ben-Gur, were charged
with seeking to install Jackie Matza as head of the Tax Authority after his
predecessor, Eitan Rub, resigned.
To do so, they arranged for Matza to
meet with Zaken, whose boss, Olmert, served as finance minister at the time and
was due to recommend a candidate to replace Rub.
Zaken met with Matza and
Karshi entered the room during the meeting. Afterwards, Zaken also met with the
two other candidates.
However, when Matza was picked by Olmert for the
job, the new Tax Authority head was under the impression that Zaken had
intervened with Olmert on his behalf, and that he therefore had a debt to her
On another occasion, Karshi and Matza clashed over who should
be appointed to one of the senior positions in the authority. Matza needed
Olmert’s approval for the appointment and asked Zaken to schedule a meeting with
the minister to discuss the matter.
Zaken, according to the indictment,
refused to schedule the meeting and instructed Matza to discuss the matter with
Karshi instead, even though Karshi was a private businessman and had no position
in the Tax Authority.
In court on Wednesday, Zaken charged that her
brother had taken advantage of her close relationship with him and exploited it
by claiming that he had engineered Matza’s appointment and that Zaken had helped
him do so.
During the hearing, the prosecutor, Michal Rozen-Ozer, asked
Zaken to describe her relationship with her brother today. Zaken began to
“I have five siblings,” she told the court. “He is the one I love
the most… Today, our relationship is not the same as it was.
everything with my brother,” she told the court. “In my personal life as well. I
told him about everything I had to deal with in my life. Whatever I achieved, I
achieved with my bare hands. It was important for me to tell my brother these
things, to share them with him and to ask his advice. Today, when I have to come
to this court and be confronted with all the evidence, my heart breaks. Being
here is very hard for me.
“Because I paid such a heavy price. I sat at
home [in house arrest] for an entire year, for no reason. I lost my innocence as
a result of this affair.”
Zaken charged that her brother had used
“When I felt I was saying such innocent things, I didn’t think for a
minute that my brother wanted to and intended to harm me,” she
Zaken said she had always been tight-lipped about her
“Everyone who knows me knows that I’m like a locked safe. I don’t
share anything. No one can harm my work, my boss.”
She also said there
was no way she could have influenced Olmert’s decision about who should be the
new head of the Tax Authority.
“Anyone who knows my boss, knows that he
decides by himself,” she said. “I can express an opinion, but he decides on his
Zaken added that Olmert had not given her any authority in this
Then why, asked Rozen-Ozer, did she meet the three candidates in
the first place? Zaken had told police during her interrogation that she had
done so as a “demonstration of power.”
But in court, she said she had met
them out of curiosity. This was just at the time that Olmert had become finance
minister and she said she wanted to get to know the candidates that had been
talked about so much.
“I also wanted to relieve the pressure on them,”
“If I can slap them on the shoulder, give them a hug and a
good word, I do it. It doesn’t go in some other direction whereby someone might
understand that if I make him feel good, he will interpret it as meaning that
he’ll get a positive answer from the minister.
“Today, I know that I have
to be more careful, but I am still certain and still know that I did not do