NATIONAL HARBOR - It’s not easy being a political conservative in the most liberal of Jewish religious denominations.
RELATED:Obama electrifies crowd at Reform Jews’ parleyReform movement leader steps down after 16 years
Just ask the 40 or so people among the more than 5,000 attendees at last week's biennial conference of the Union for Reform Judaism who showed up for a session on political conservatism.
“We didn’t know if anyone would come,” said Laurie Silber, a synagogue president from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, who organized the session. Only four names appeared ahead of time on the online sign-up sheet.
“When I saw this session on the schedule, I thought it was a joke,” one attendee said. “But I’m glad there’s one or two of us.”
For participants, the lunchtime meeting on the conference’s second day served as something of a griping session, with audience member after audience member standing to blow off steam about the liberal bias among Reform Jews.
But for Reform leaders it was part of a broader effort to project an image of the movement as nonpartisan, as well as to ensure political balance in a conference that featured President Obama as a keynote speaker.
In addition to the lunchtime conversation, which was organized at Silber’s request, the biennial featured a plenary speech by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and a debate between conservative William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard
, and Rabbi David Saperstein, head of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, titled “Liberalism, Conservatism: Which Better Furthers Jewish Values and Jewish Interests?”
Nonpartisanship long has been a challenge in a movement so closely identified with signature Democratic positions such as women’s reproductive rights, gay equality and social welfare issues. The Religious Action Center, the Reform movement's advocacy arm in Washington, takes decidedly liberal stances on issues from health care reform to wars overseas. And in his introduction to Obama’s speech, the movement’s outgoing president, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, noted that the president has been a champion for many of the values the Reform movement holds dear, citing the issue of health care reform.
Not all Reform Jews esteem the same values, however.
“There’s an idea that Reform Judaism must be liberal on every front, and
I don’t think that’s true,” said Rabbi Jonathan Siger of the
Houston-area Congregation Jewish Community North, in Spring, Texas.
“Tikkun olam doesn’t mean giving away money,” said one participant in the session on conservatism.
“Isn’t there something in the Jewish tradition about people helping themselves?” asked another.
“We can all be for tikkun olam if it doesn’t mean paying for it,” said a third.
More than any other issue, however, participants complained of what they
described as the hypocrisy of liberal Reform Jews who preach pluralism
and tolerance while disparaging or silencing conservative voices.
“It’s very hard to have a civil discourse,” said a past president of a
Reform synagogue in Los Angeles. “They assume everyone is liberal. At
least talk and listen.”
A woman from Lehigh Valley, Pa., chimed in, “Trying to even have a
discussion is impossible because they will not listen to the facts.”
One man described the attitude of Reform Jews toward political conservatives as “xenophobia.”
In an interview with JTA, Silber recalled posting some conservative
comments on a listserv of synagogue presidents and then getting shut out
by vocally liberal participants who complained that she was making the
discussion too political.
Most of the participants at the December 15 conference session did not
seem to be dyed-in-the-wool conservatives. Many proclaimed themselves
fiscal conservatives but social liberals. A physician from Fort Worth,
Texas, talked about how he voted for Obama because he was concerned that
John McCain as president might succumb to melanoma and leave the Oval
Office in the hands of Sarah Palin. Another lamented what he called the
hijacking of the Republican Party by political extremists. And not one
person mentioned any of the Republican candidates for president during
the freewheeling discussion.
“My conservatism is economic, in terms of smaller government, individual
rights, relationship with Israel,” Siger told JTA. “Socially I’m
A few session participants said that Israel was the key issue that had
thrust them into the conservative camp, at least within the Reform
“I have long been unhappy with the debate about Israel in the Reform
movement,” said Rabbi David Kaufman of Temple B’nai Jeshurun in Des
Moines, Iowa. A founder of a group called We Are for Israel, Kaufman was
one of five rabbis at the session.
“There are a lot more politically conservative Republican Jews than people think, especially when it comes to Israel,” he said.
But when someone at the session questioned the bona fides of the
incoming president of the movement, Rabbi Rick Jacobs, noting Jacobs’
past affiliations with the New Israel Fund and J Street, Kaufman came to
“I wouldn’t worry about Rick,” Kaufman said. “He’s good on Israel.”
When The Weekly Standard
Kristol made a surprise visit to the session, he credited Jacobs for
including him, Cantor and Natan Sharansky - a politically conservative
former refusenik who is now the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel
- on the biennial program.
But there was no mistaking the fact that at least at this conference on
the outskirts of Washington, political conservatives were a tiny
“It occurs to me,” Siger said, “that we are the 1 percent.”