On June 13, US President Barack Obama, campaigning for reelection, plans to
honor President Shimon Peres by bestowing upon him the prestigious Presidential
Medal of Freedom. Whatever Obama’s motives, this could constitute a source of
pride for much-maligned Israel.
But it could turn into a hollow gesture
should Peres be feted while Jonathan Pollard is still denied
freedom. Obama holds the key to Pollard’s cell. It behooves Peres to
persuade Obama to use it. Peres, thus far, has been true to his promise and did
formally ask for Pollard’s release.
Pollard is in his 27th year of
imprisonment for passing American intelligence (about inimical third countries –
Iraq, Libya, the then-PLO headquarters in Tunis) to a friendly country (Israel).
He should have been freed long ago and not only because his health is now
His continued incarceration is plainly unjust. His sentence to
begin with was ultra-harsh. Lighter punishment was meted to assorted US spies
for greater offenses, including those involving tangible security risks to
Although Pollard’s life-term is unprecedented for transferring
classified material to an ally, no US administration in nearly three decades
countenanced pardoning him. This, despite the fact that in 1991 Pollard publicly
apologized and expressed further remorse in a 1996 open letter to then-president
Bill Clinton. In 1998, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu admitted that Pollard
spied for Israel and sought to free him as part of the Wye River deal. Clinton
reneged on the agreement.
As things stand, it appears that the current
administration is toying with the emotions of the entire Israeli collective. It
issued an ambiguous statement which news agencies impetuously misrepresented as
a rejection of Peres’s request. Peres held his own and released a communiqué
saying he has not received Obama’s response and still awaits it.
point for Obama to rebuff Peres would represent a massive slap in the face.
Obama didn’t refuse him – not officially or personally. The ball is still in
And it is quite a unique play. The medal, which was to have been a
symbolic pat on Israel’s back with multiple political perks for both sides, has
been turned into a catalyst for reinforcing another dynamic – the clamor for
Pollard’s long overdue liberation.
Because of the medal, two presidents
are now forced into an apparent stand-off. Pollard, though physically in his
North Carolina maximum security prison, has somehow come between Obama and Peres
like the veritable pink elephant in the room – a huge moral predicament that
everyone is acutely aware of, but would have preferred to avoid.
tries to go ahead with Peres’s ceremony while concomitantly keeping Pollard
behind bars, he would be seen as giving the lie to his own declared motives for
honoring Peres. If Peres is honored while Pollard keeps languishing, his image
too would suffer a blow which Obama certainly does not intend to
What may have started as a public relations stunt that could
have afforded beleaguered Israel rare contentment, might be exposed as another
instance of disingenuous posturing on the American side and outright humiliation
for the Israeli.
But this is not preordained. Should Pollard be freed
pre-ceremony, all Israelis would sincerely share in the joy of Peres’s honor.
For this, Obama needs recall that he presents himself as the voice of American
conscience. It is time that he perform what is incontrovertibly an act of
Moreover, for Obama it is risk-free, rife with potential
reward and wholly without political detriment. Nobody can credibly persevere in
the sham that Pollard threatens American national security interests. Indeed the
pendulum has swung hard and many former higher-ups (like ex-secretaries of state
Henry Kissinger and George Schultz) now support Pollard’s release.
cannot escape the impression that the only reason Pollard is still denied his
freedom is because he is Jewish and hence his disproportionate
It is certainly high time the torment of the aging Pollard be
discontinued. He has more than paid for what he did. Holding him captive as he
grows older and infirm serves no purpose and can be judged as nothing but
vindictive and sadistic.
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Think others should know about this? Please share