Israeli and Palestinian leaders are in Washington trying to make peace – again.
This summit marks the latest chapter in a story that began on the White House
lawn 17 years ago, when Israelis and Palestinians committed themselves to ending
the conflict once and for all. Since then, every round has failed and bloodshed
has continued. Against the backdrop of Tuesday’s Palestinian terrorist attack
that left four Israeli civilians dead, including a pregnant woman, why should
these negotiations be different? Is there any reason for optimism? Indeed, there
is. For the first time in history, most Arab leaders view a Middle Eastern state
other than Israel – Iran – as their major enemy. The Israeli government under
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is strong, stable and deeply committed to
resolving the conflict based on two states for two peoples.
In the West
Bank, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is working to restore law,
order and economic prosperity while similarly pledging to pursue the two-state
solution. And President Barack Obama has placed achieving peace at the top of
his foreign-policy agenda. Never before, perhaps, have conditions been so
Still, daunting obstacles remain. Nearly half of the territory
slated to become part of a Palestinian state is controlled by Hamas, an
Iranian-backed terrorist group dedicated to Israel’s destruction.
Palestinian Authority, meanwhile, is insisting that Israel freeze all
construction in West Bank Jewish communities indefinitely. While little can be
done at this stage to neutralize the Hamas threat – the hope is that the people
of Gaza will someday rid themselves of Hamas and opt for peace – the
construction issue need not be a deal breaker. Adding a bedroom for a growing
family should not disrupt the peace process.
THE WEST Bank – or, as the
Bible calls it, Judea and Samaria – was twice used as a staging ground for wars
of annihilation against Israel, which captured the area in 1967.
to the Jewish people for 3,000 years and vital to the defense of Israel’s
borders (which were a mere eight miles wide prior to 1967), the West Bank became
home to hundreds of thousands of Israelis. With the start of the peace process
in 1993, successive Israeli governments recognized the need to make painful
sacrifices in these territories while upholding the right of Israeli citizens to
continue building there. Palestinian and Israeli leaders agreed that the final
status of these settlements would be determined, along with Jerusalem, refugees
and borders, in the peace talks.
Since assuming office a year and a half
ago, Netanyahu has made several gestures to the Palestinians to encourage them
to return to the negotiating table. In addition to removing hundreds of
checkpoints and facilitating the Palestinian economic boom, he has refrained
from building any new settlements, from acquiring new territory for existing
ones and from offering Israelis incentives to move to them. Finally, in a
measure described as “unprecedented” by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,
Netanyahu froze all new construction within the settlements for a 10- month
The Palestinians are now threatening to quit the negotiations
unless Netanyahu extends the construction freeze. Israel, of course, is seeking
specific goals in the talks, including demilitarization of the Palestinian state
and its recognition of Israel as the nation of the Jewish people. Israel also
wants the Palestinians to cease teaching their children that Israel has no right
to exist, and naming public squares after terrorists. But we are not insisting
that the Palestinians meet these objectives before the talks even begin. We
appreciate, therefore, Secretary Clinton’s call for “good faith” negotiations
Settlements have never been an obstacle to
Though Israelis account for 17 percent of the West Bank’s
population, they inhabit a mere 1.7% of the land. The existence of the
settlements did not prevent Egypt and Jordan from making peace with Israel, or
the Palestinians from negotiating with us for nearly two decades. All parties to
negotiations understand that the large settlement clusters will, in any
final-status treaty, remain part of Israel.
As President Obama launches
the direct Israeli-Palestinian talks, there is indeed reason for optimism, in
spite of the obstacles. If the core issues are determined at the table rather
than before negotiations start, Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas can
move swiftly and confidently toward concluding an historic treaty. Though long
overdue, the peace we have yearned for may yet be achieved.
The writer is
Israeli ambassador to the United States. – MCT
Stay on top of the news - get the Jerusalem Post headlines direct to your inbox!