Dad claiming 'sperm theft' ruled liable for child support

By
February 12, 2012 12:35

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Tiberias Family Court on Sunday ruled that a man who claims the mother of his five-year-old child "stole his sperm" in order to become pregnant must nonetheless pay child support.

The child was conceived when her father, A. and her mother, R.. had a one-night stand while living in a shared apartment, but the parents gave conflicting versions about the circumstances. A. claimed that the child was conceived as a result of "sperm theft", that R. had no intention of maintaining contact with him and that she had informed him she would bring up the child by herself, and would not sue him for child support. R. denies these claims, however.

In dismissing A.'s arguments, Judge Assaf Zagury said that minors "cannot be restricted by the behavior or understanding of their parents", and therefore A. must pay child support.

Both the mother, R., and the child are named on the family court suit against A., but the judge noted that in fact the child is entitled to file a suit independently of R.

Related Content

Breaking news
July 23, 2018
Pompeo compares Iran's leaders to "mafia"

By REUTERS