Meretz defends painting of J'lem sign in name of gay pride

August 2, 2012 15:35


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Meretz on Thursday defended the actions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activists who painted the white “Welcome to Jerusalem” sign in rainbow colors ahead of the 10th annual Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade.

"The painting of the city gates in the colors of pride is not an act of vandalism but an impressive and brave act, said Dror Mizrahi, chairman of the Meretz Pride Forum. "I'm only sorry that this act was done by private citizens instead of the Jerusalem Municipality."

Police opened an investigation into the painting incident, and the sign was immediately cleaned.

Elinor Sidi, director of Jerusalem’s Open House, the LGBT community center, said Thursday that the his organization is against all forms of violence, including vandalism of public property.

Related Content

Breaking news
July 21, 2018
Trump says 'perhaps illegal' for lawyer to tape client