Police recommend alternative route for far right activists march

August 1, 2016 20:07
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In response to a petition to the High Court of Justice by far-right activists seeking to march in an Arab village in northern Israel, the police have retracted their opposition in principle to the march but have recommended a different route.

The activists, including former MK Dr. Michael Ben Ari, Baruch Marzel, Attorney Itamar Ben-Gvir, and Bentzi Gopstein, have said they will examine the new proposals and inform the court whether or not the new route is acceptable to them. Following the terrorist attack perpetrated by Nashet Milhem on Dizengoff street in Tel Aviv in January in which three people were killed, the activists issued a request to the Coastal District Police to march through Milhem’s village of Ara in the Haifa District, and past the house of his parents where he took shelter after the attack.

The police refused saying that the march would offend the residents of the village and could lead to disturbances of the public order.

At a hearing in the High Court on Monday, Ben-Gvir argued that this refusal contravened the right to freedom of expression and said that such a stance would constitute a victory for the threat of violence to the right to protest. The state attorney’s office recommended a new route that would provide the required balances between freedom of expression and preserving the public order.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Breaking news
April 19, 2019
IDF forces demolish homes belonging to Ori Ansbacher's killer