Shipping lines scale back war risk surcharge [p. 15]

By DANIEL KENNEMER
August 13, 2006 23:48
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Shipping lines operating out of Northern Europe, Portugal and the Baltic Sea - together representing the majority of sea traffic to and from Israel - will cut their heightened war risk surcharge on Israel-bound containers by 30 percent. "Since in time it became apparent that the risk was not as high [as the companies had thought], the companies began reducing the war risk surcharge," Manufacturers Association transport committee chairman Zvi Plada said Sunday, noting that Zim was the first liner to cut the surcharge. The liners' decision will bring the average surcharge on a 20-foot container down to $85 from $115, reducing the total cost to the Israeli economy to $300,000 daily from $450,000. Prior to the outbreak of fighting in the North, the war surcharge amounted to only $9 for a small container and $18 for a 40-foot container, Plada said. Companies that have yet to reduce their surcharge include Maersk, China Shipping, and Israel-based Allalouf & Co. Shipping, alongside other shipping lines from China and those operating from Black Sea ports, he said. Efforts by the government to pressure international insurance companies to cut the surcharge through Inbal - the government's own insurance provider - failed to recruit clients among the shipping lines, since the Inbal policy did not cover damages related to injury of crew members or loss of profit, he said. The surcharge would drop "significantly" once a cease-fire agreement is signed or takes effect, but still would be several times higher than the pre-war level, Plada predicted. "Once the surcharge is raised, it takes some time to bring it back down." To date, Israeli industry, commerce and agriculture have had to pay nearly $10 million because of the insurance companies' decision to hike the surcharge in the third week of July, he said. Plada stressed that the Port of Ashdod has managed to stay on top of the drastic increase in its burden since the partial closure of the Haifa port, so there has been "almost no damage" to Israeli exports and imports.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS