New proposals for competitive energy market

One of the main sources for alternative energy the European Commission is advancing is nuclear power generation.

By WHAT'S NEW IN THE EU WITH ARI SYRQUIN
November 28, 2007 08:06
4 minute read.
eu flag biz what's new 88

eu flag biz 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

One of the main sources for alternative energy the European Commission is advancing is nuclear power generation. In recent weeks there has been increasing public debate on the European Commission's proposals aimed at guaranteeing real and effective competition for all EU citizens and companies for their gas and electricity needs. In particular, a number of the companies opposing them have raised questions regarding the Commission's Impact Assessment, the document that lays down the facts and evidence why these measures are necessary. Nuclear power generation is a very touchy subject as far as Israel is considered. On the one hand nuclear power has great potential to divert worldwide and European dependency on fossil fuel. With that comes lower dependency of the West on Arab countries and the anti- Israeli pressure which comes with that. Furthermore, this can help to achieve a cleaner planet. On the other hand, hostile countries (e.g. Iran) can use nuclear power as an excuse for their nuclear plants and race for an Atomic bomb. When discussing nuclear power one has to take into account the complexity of the transportation of the materials involved in the process.The legal framework ruling the transport of radioactive materials in the European Union is rather complex, since it is based at the same time on International Agreements and on Community regulations, these last stemming from both EC and Euratom Treaties. The regulatory complexity is mainly due to the own nature of the radioactive material, which is classified under the generic concept of "dangerous goods" and, on the other hand, it also includes miscellaneous substances that could contain fissile and/or non-fissile isotopes. Where two or more regulatory bodies have the mandate to regulate the transport of radioactive materials depending on the mode of transport, it is a continuing challenge to ensure that their roles and interfaces are clear. Some of the issues are inconsistencies in the way that applications for approval of packages and shipments, are considered by competent authorities in different countries, and variations between member states in the requirements relating to the security of radioactive material during transport. Also, specific legal issues regarding security, safeguards, dual-use or civil liability as regards radioactive materials, have also to be considered in many cases due to the particular features of some radioactive material to be transported. The transport of radioactive materials has always attracted the interest of the public and the media, although the number of related accidents or incidents with safety consequences is unusual. According to a survey by the European Commission from two years ago (Special Eurobarometer about radioactive waste (2005) ) the transport of radioactive materials is one of the major fears of European citizens concerning radioactive waste to an extent that seven out of ten EU citizens believed that even the transport of low-level radioactive waste presented a risk. Special activities enable carrying radioactive materials out from behind the factory perimeter fence and into the community, on to the highways, on air, and the railways. The smallest incident involving the transport of radioactive materials, no matter the lack of any real or potential radiological consequences, has the potential to play to people's fears. Therefore, the necessity of transparency by informing and communicating to the public safety issues concerning the transport of radioactive materials should be a major issue for National Competent Authorities. For that purposes, the availability of systems of information and data collection as well as reporting is important to learn from any such events. In the case of the transport of nuclear (fissile) materials the need of information and transparency is even higher because of strong feelings it raises among the public. But this need for transparency could be also conflicting with guidelines (INFCIRC/225/Rev. 4, Recommendations for the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material.). These recommendations set an objective for the member states to establish conditions which would minimize the possibilities for unauthorized removal of nuclear material or for sabotage and requires that appropriate measures, consistent with national requirements, should be taken to protect the confidentiality of information relating to transport operations, including detailed information on the schedule and route. In this context the Commission has launched an Impact Assessment to support decisions about simplification of the legislative framework for transportation of radioactive materials. The identification of problems was based on the fifth report on the Standing Working Group (SWG) on Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials in the European Union (COM(2006) 102 final) as the most legitimate instrument mandated by the European Parliament to identify such problems. Thus, delays in transport, denials of transboundary shipments, the need of more transparency about shipments and the important administrative burden associated to such activities, usually with strong differences from a member state to another, are the most common problems raised by the SWG. Such problems could create obstacles to the free movement of goods and, hence, to a sound implementation of the internal market of radioactive materials. Thus, denial of shipments of radioactive materials intended for use in medical diagnosis and treatment continued to be a major issue. The vast majority of denials were for air transport, which is, in most cases, the only practical method to ensure these materials reach their intended destinations in a timely manner. Besides, delays in transport of medical radioisotopes could substantially affect their therapeutic properties, mainly for those of short half-life. Finally, the lack of transparency concerning the transport of nuclear materials could create public concerns towards nuclear activities in general. syrquin@013.net The author is the head of the International Department at Joseph Shem-Tov law firm

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS