Goldstone opinion piece changes nothing at UN

UNHRC spokesman tells 'Post' that retired judge must submit formal letter for the body to consider rescinding his report.

By
April 5, 2011 01:25
2 minute read.
Judge Richard Goldstone

Judge Richard Goldstone 311 (R). (photo credit: Reuters)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The United Nations Human Rights Council can only consider rescinding the Goldstone Report if its author, South African jurist Richard Goldstone, submits a formal written letter with such a request to the council, its spokesman told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

The approval of the other three members of his fact-finding mission, which produced the report, would be needed for the UNHRC president to consider action, council spokesman Cedric Sapey said.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
'Goldstone’s retractions won’t change legal realities'
PA still intends to pursue Israeli ‘war crimes’ at UN, ICC
'Goldstone retraction reduces chance of similar probe'
Comment: Goldstone the belated penitent

He added that the council had not received any request from the fact-finding mission to rescind the report.

Sapey spoke with the Post after Goldstone wrote an opinion piece in Friday’s Washington Post, in which he said he had erroneously accused Israel of intentionally targeting Palestinian civilians when it attacked Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009.

This allegation was among the reasons the report concluded that Israel’s actions in Gaza constituted possible war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Since Friday, politicians and legal as well as human rights experts have speculated on what impact, if any, his opinion piece would have on initiatives to use the report to continue condemning Israel in the UN and possibly in the International Criminal Court.



Only one other member of the fact-finding mission, Desmond Travers, has commented on the matter since Friday.

“The tenor of the report in its entirety, in my opinion, stands,” Travers told the Associated Press.

The council has not responded to the opinion piece, but its spokesman did explain what it meant procedurally.

Sapey said Goldstone had written his opinion piece as a private individual and that a newspaper article alone would not immediately change council procedure.

An observer state to the council with the combined support of a member state, however, could use the letter as the basis for filing a resolution before the council at its next session or at a special session.

That resolution could ask that the council rescind the report, Sapey said.

Separately a move by a UN member state could be made to rescind the report at the United Nations General Assembly, which also endorsed the document, he said.

If no further action is taken either by the fact-finding mission or by a UN member state, then the report stands.

Last month, the UNHRC passed a resolution asking the General Assembly to endorse the report for a second time and to pass it on to the UN Security Council so it could consider referring the situation of the “occupied Palestinian territories” to the International Criminal Court.

At present, that resolution still stands and is expected to move forward to the UN General Assembly.

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN