Right not reassured by Livni on ‘interim accord’

Justice minister denies accusations made by Danny Danon, Ze'ev Elkin, saying she never even used the term.

October 4, 2013 00:51
1 minute read.
Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon of Likud

MK Danny Danon 311. (photo credit: Courtesy: Knesset)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Likud Deputy Ministers Ze’ev Elkin and Danny Danon said on Thursday that they were still worried that Justice Minister Tzipi Livni will seek an interim agreement with the Palestinian Authority despite her statements to the contrary in an interview published in Thursday’s Jerusalem Post.

Livni said she was seeking a final-status agreement that would end the Israeli-Arab conflict in her negotiations and that she had not changed her tactic from her previous talks with the Palestinians that ended in 2008: There is no deal on anything until there is a deal on everything.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

She denied repeated accusations by Elkin and Danon that she was working on achieving an interim agreement that would create a Palestinian state in temporary borders. She said she had never even used the term “interim agreement.”

“I don’t doubt that she wants to achieve a permanent agreement based on 1967 lines like she tried to do in the Annapolis process,” Elkin said. “My concern is that when there inevitably will be difficulties in the attempts to reach a final-status deal, an interim deal will be pursued. That would be a big mistake.”

Citing the Oslo process and the Gaza Strip withdrawal, the deputy foreign minister said history had proven attempts to reach a permanent agreement via interim stages very dangerous.

“I cannot relax, because I don’t know what will happen and what kind of American pressure there will be when the nine-month deadline to reach a deal approaches,” Elkin said.

Danon also expressed his lack of confidence in Israel’s chief negotiator.

“We saw the results of the negotiations during the time of [prime minister Ehud] Olmert and [then-foreign minister] Livni,” Danon said. “We will not let her lead the government to such a dangerous path.”

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN