Amendment passed to review beach-area plans

Existing building plans for beachside construction will now be subject to reexamination.

July 16, 2012 03:38
2 minute read.
Israelis and tourists at Tel Aviv beach

Israelis and tourists at Tel Aviv beach 370. (photo credit: REUTERS/Havakuk Levison)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Existing building plans for beachside construction will now be subject to reexamination, after the Ministerial Committee on Legislative Affairs approved an amendment to the 2004 Law for the Protection of the Coastal Environment on Sunday.

“I am happy that I succeeded in convincing my colleagues to support the law,” said Environmental Protection Minister Gilad Erdan. “Very little space is left on the beach areas for the enjoyment of the public, and there is no reason to continue to block them with concrete monsters. Even countries that enjoy much more extensive coasts don’t authorize private building on their beaches.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The amendment corrects a loophole in the original law, calling for a reexamination of beach-building plans approved before the creation of that law but still not yet executed. If the Committee to Save the Coastal Environmental (the ValHof) – also established in 2004 alongside the law – determines that the site of the scheduled plans constitutes a natural resource, the developer will need to move the project to a location slightly farther from the shore, according to the new amendment.

Last Tuesday, environmental activists had staged an “emergency march” from Tel Aviv City Hall to Bograshov Beach, in support of the amendment’s passage.

Submitted by MK Dov Henin (Hadash) and signed by 17 additional lawmakers, the text of the amendment was drafted by environmental advocacy group Adam Teva V’Din – Israel Union for Environmental Defense and the legal clinic at Bar-Ilan University.

Henin called the approval “a significant step in protecting the coast of Israel,” thanking his partners from the Beaches Forum and Adam Teva V’Din, as well as other environmental organizations and the general public, for the recent surge in support for the bill.

“The passage of the coastal protection law is a significant step in protecting Israel’s coasts from initiatives that threaten to erode the few beaches we have left,” said Henin, who is the chairman of the Knesset’s Joint Committee for Health and Environment. “Instead of struggling each time separately – in Palmahim, in Betzet, in Nahsholim, in Dor, in Nitzanim and in many other cases – the law will produce a widespread, professional and just solution.”

Prior to the amendment’s passage, Adam Teva V’Din had said in a statement: “It is necessary to put an end legislatively to old plans that will lead to irreversible environmental damage on the shores of our country.”

“In recent years we have seen the widespread phenomenon of apartments, vacation villages and marinas being built on the most beautiful slices of beach in Israel, blocking public access to the beach and causing damage to unique and pristine beaches,” the organization’s executive director, Amit Bracha wrote. “A portion of the plans were approved more than 20 years ago, during a period when the importance of preserving open spaces and beaches was not yet recognized.”

Bracha therefore stressed that the government has a “responsibility to repair the damages of the past.” The organization praised Sunday’s approval, and asked that government officials continue to support the amendment as it goes through the Knesset.

Related Content

Holland Park’s forest, north of Eilat.
August 11, 2014
Promising trend of prosecution for environmental crimes, officials say