Timeline of Olmert's legal battle

Former PM, acquitted on Tuesday of two major corruption charges, once dubbed the trial a "fight for his life."

July 11, 2012 02:20
2 minute read.
FORMER PRIME MINISTER Ehud Olmert in court

FORMER PRIME MINISTER Ehud Olmert in court 370. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

When Ehud Olmert stepped down as prime minister in September 2008, he vowed to wage a “legal battle” to clear his name of the corruption charges that had forced his resignation.

On Tuesday, the former prime minister partially won that battle, but with the Holyland trial only just beginning in the Tel Aviv District Court, he still has much of the war left to fight.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

In August 2009, the prosecution filed charges against Olmert relating to the three corruption scandals that led him to step down a year earlier – alleged double-billing with the Rishon Tours travel agency, accepting thousands of dollars in cash envelopes from New York businessman Morris Talansky and granting illegal favors to his former associate, attorney Uri Messer.

In the indictment, the prosecution formally charged Olmert with fraud, breach of trust, forging corporate documents and failure to report income.

Although police had initially also recommended pressing bribery charges, the State Attorney’s Office did not include those allegations in the final indictment.

The charges all related to Olmert’s terms as mayor of Jerusalem and later as minister of trade, labor and industry, before he became prime minister.

When the trial opened in the Jerusalem District Court in December 2009, Olmert appeared with only part of his legal team, as his main lawyer, Yehuda Weinstein, had resigned after being appointed attorney-general.

Throughout the trial, the former prime minister continued to deny the charges against him, telling the court when he took the witness stand last year that he was “fighting for his life.”

A year ago, in July 2011, the trial heated up as the prosecution began its crossexamination of Olmert.

During his time on the witness stand, Olmert and prosecutor Uri Korb engaged in bitter verbal sparring – with Jerusalem District Court President Judge Moussia Arad often intervening and asking for calm.

Throughout the trial, Olmert’s press spokesman, Amir Dan, frequently accused Korb and the prosecution of resorting to “dirty tricks” and of trying to create media spin, including by alleging during cross-examination that the former prime minister had tried to disrupt the Rishon Tours investigation by talking to his family about the matter.

When Olmert ended his testimony last July, Dan told The Jerusalem Post that the charges against the former prime minister were “simply absurd.”

On Tuesday, after his acquittal on the Talansky and Rishon Tours charges, Olmert said he had been vindicated.

“There had been no corruption, no money was received, no money was used, there were no cash envelopes,” he told reporters. “Not a thing that they tried to accuse me of regarding that affair was true.”

With the verdict in, the court will reconvene on September 5 to hear arguments for sentencing both Zaken and Olmert. The former prime minister is unlikely to receive jail time.

Related Content

Supreme Court President Asher Grunis
August 28, 2014
Grapevine: September significance