Bush won't set timetable for pullout

Bush to ask Olmert if 'convergence' is compatible with negotiated solution.

May 19, 2006 01:59
2 minute read.
bush looks to side 298.88

bush looks to side298.88. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


President George Bush will ask Prime Minister Ehud Olmert if his convergence plan was compatible with the idea of a two-state solution when the two leaders will meet next week. According to a senior administration official, Bush will expect Olmert to explain how a unilateral move could be compatible with the US administration's wish for a negotiated final status agreement. The official told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that President Bush will not express his opinion on the plan at this stage. "We need answers before the President can make a decision. There will be no decisions made at this meeting," the official emphasized. The US administration believes that there is sufficient time to pursue both the idea of direct negotiations on a final status agreement and the unilateral withdrawal plan, since no settlement would be removed before the end of 2007 or the middle of 2008. According to the official, it would still be possible to go ahead with negotiations if there was a political change in the Palestinian Authority by the time Israel was ready to implement the convergence plan. Although "There is no timetable and no fixed date," the official said, "Olmert has limited time in office" and wanted to implement his plan while George Bush was still in the White House. Even so, the US would not set a deadline for Olmert on implementing the convergence plan. Though it does not support Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas' request for entering final status discussions, the Bush administration expects Israel to speak to Abbas on issues of humanitarian assistance, border crossings and tax revenue. Bush and cabinet members will present several questions regarding Olmert's plan for unilateral withdrawal plan in a series of meetings to be held in Washington next week. The questions will deal with issues of IDF forces that may remain to the west of the fence, negotiations with Jordan on border issues, protection of the holy sites in the West Bank after Israel withdraws and the legal status of the new borderline. The administration official estimated that there were at least two-dozen questions regarding Olmert's plan that were still not answered. "The Gaza disengagement was easy, because the borders were clear and there were no Israelis left there," the official said, adding that a plan for unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank was "extremely complicated." The official stressed that the US view was that most of the settlements in the West Bank "need to go," though he added that the administration remained committed to the statement in Bush's letter to Ariel Sharon in which he spoke of the reality on the ground created by major Jewish settlement blocs. Bush was also expected to raise the issue of sending assistance to the Palestinian Authority without allowing aid to go through the Hamas-led government. The administration still believed that pressure on Hamas was building, and that this pressure might bring about a change in the organization's policies. According to the senior official, the administration believed that Hamas was trying to maintain terror at a low level while not doing a thing to eliminate it altogether.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

December 17, 2018
Jordan, Japan launch strategic dialogue to boost bilateral ties