Ex-counterterror chief warns Bush

Expert: Highly unlikely that Iran strike would end favorably for the US.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 16, 2006 09:20
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke warned the Bush administration in an opinion piece Sunday against a military strike on Iran. The administration of Bill Clinton also considered a bombing campaign against Iran amid tensions in the 1990s, but "after long debate, the highest levels of the military could not forecast a way in which things would end favorably for the United States," Clarke said in the op-ed piece in The New York Times. The piece was co-authored with another former senior counterterrorism official, Steven Simon. Recent media reports have suggested that President George W. Bush's administration is considering a military attack of Iran over concerns that the country is developing a nuclear weapon. Bush has dismissed those reports as "wild speculation." The US is working with the UN Security Council to press Iran to stop its nuclear program. Clarke and Simon theorized that Iran would respond to US aggression in three possible ways: attack Persian Gulf oil facilities to drive up oil prices, use its alleged terror network to strike American targets around the world, or send Shiite militias to aid insurgents in Iraq. "We would like to believe that the administration is not intent on starting another war, because a conflict with Iran could be even more damaging to our interests than the current struggle in Iraq has been," Clarke and Simon said in the Times piece Sunday. Clarke has before called the invasion of Iraq an "enormous mistake" that is further increasing the United States' tensions with Mideast countries. A counterterrorism adviser to the past three presidents, Clarke wrote the book "Against All Enemies," which strongly criticizes the Bush administration for making Iraq a top priority and for underestimating warnings about al-Qaida before the September 11 attacks.

Related Content

U.S. President Donald Trump receives a football from Russian President Vladimir Putin
July 20, 2018
Trump invites Putin to Washington despite U.S. uproar over Helsinki summit

By REUTERS