'Experts say US missile defense strategy flawed'

National Research Council says US vulnerable to type of long-range missiles Iran may be developing, 'NY Times' reports.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
September 12, 2012 06:32
1 minute read.
Iranian Fateh-110 missile [file]

Iranian Fateh-110 missile 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A United States National Research Council report found that the US missile defense system is flawed, and the US is subsequently vulnerable to certain types of long-range strikes, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

The 16-person panel, comprising top scientists, engineers and weapon experts, recommended that US President Barack Obama change tack in his defense strategy. It suggested that Obama expand a system he inherited from former US president George W. Bush in order to be better prepared to defeat the type of long-range missiles Iran may be developing, according to the Times.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


In 2009, Obama decided to alter course from the Bush administration's plan, focusing on the threat of shorter-range ballistic missiles to US forces and allies in Europe and the Middle East.

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

The National Research Council report, however, called the existing antimissile arms "fragile” and full of “shortcomings that limit their effectiveness against even modestly improved threats.”

"For too long, the US has been committed to expensive missile defense strategies without sufficient consideration of the costs and real utility,” the panel’s co-chairman L. David Montague was quoted as saying. 

The Pentagon, however, dismissed the report as "pedestrian," according to the Times.    



Earlier Tuesday, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that if Iran decides to make a nuclear weapon, the United States would have a little more than a year to act to stop it.

Panetta said the United States has the capability to prevent Iran from building an atomic bomb.

"We have the forces in place to be able to not only defend ourselves, but to do what we have to do to try to stop them from developing nuclear weapons," he said on CBS's "This Morning" program.

Related Content

U.S. President Donald Trump receives a football from Russian President Vladimir Putin
July 20, 2018
Trump invites Putin to Washington despite U.S. uproar over Helsinki summit

By REUTERS