NYT: E1 plans don't preclude contiguous Palestine

'New York Times' issues correction to Dec. 2 article which "described imprecisely" effect of Israeli E1 development plans.

December 16, 2012 17:14
1 minute read.
THE AREA in Ma’aleh Adumim known as E1

E1 370. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The New York Times on Saturday published a correction to a December 2 article which claimed that prospective Israeli plans to develop the E1 corridor between Jerusalem and Ma'aleh Adumim "would be a roadblock to plans for a contiguous Palestinian state."

Earlier this month, Israel announced plans to build 3,000 housing units in E1 in response to the successful bid by Palestinians to upgrade their status at the UN.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The Times article, written by the Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren, contended that "critics see development of E1 as a threat to the meaningful contiguity of a Palestinian state...because it would leave some Palestinian areas [in the West Bank] connected to one another only by roads with few exits or by circuitous routes."

In its December 15 correction, however, the Times conceded that the article "described imprecisely the effect of [E1] development on access to the cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem from Jerusalem, and on the West Bank."

"Development of E1 would limit access to Ramallah and Bethlehem; it would not completely cut off those cities from Jerusalem," the correction stated. Accordingly, it continued,
such plans "would not divide the West Bank in two."

The Times correction concluded that "proposed [E1] development would not technically make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible," a reality the December 2 article "referred incompletely to" due to "an editing error."

Last week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu described as "simply false" suggestions that construction in E1 precluded the eventual emergence of a Palestinian state.


Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Protesters with painted faces pray in Cambodia
November 16, 2018
U.N.-Cambodian court convicts two former Khmer Rouge leaders of genocide