Straw stands by Muslim veil comments

"I can communicate with constituents more easily if i can see their faces."

October 6, 2006 10:59
2 minute read.
Straw stands by Muslim veil comments

jack straw 298 88 ap. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw on Friday stood by comments published the previous day that he would ask Muslim women visiting his office to remove their veils, remarks that angered some Muslim groups who said such a request was disrespectful. "If my constituents comes to me to voice a concern or to discuss a particular issue, I can communicate with them much more easily and come to a greater understanding of their problems if I can see their facial expressions," Straw told Sky News. The Islamic Human Rights commission called Straw's comments "appalling." Straw wrote in a column for the Lancashire Telegraph newspaper on Thursday that he felt uncomfortable talking with someone whose face he could not see, and described the veil as a "visible statement of separation and difference." "I explain that this is a country built on freedoms. I defend absolutely the right of any women to wear a headscarf," Straw said. But, he continued, "The value of a meeting, as opposed to a letter or phone call, is so that you can - almost literally - see what the other person means, and not just hear what they say." Straw, who is now leader of the House of Commons, represents a low-income, heavily Muslim community in northwestern England. He said in the column that he worries that what he described as an increasing number of British Muslim women wearing the veil would hinder ties with non-Muslims. Scarves that cover the face are "bound to make better, positive relations between the two communities more difficult," he wrote. Straw said he ensures a female member of his staff is present during his meetings. He said none of his constituents had refused to remove her veil, and thought most seemed relieved to do so. But a leader of the Islamic Human Rights Commission said Straw's position "put barriers" in the way of Muslim women at a time when they are encouraged to participate more in British society. "We're really astonished that someone so senior and responsible as Mr. Straw would make such a statement," chairman Massoud Shadjareh said. "I'm sure many people go (to his office) with many different types of clothing and fashions. Why does he suddenly have a problem with this? It's outrageous." But Daud Abdullah, of the Muslim Council of Britain, told Britain's Press Association news agency that he understood Straw's position. "The veil does cause some discomfort to non-Muslims. One can understand this," he said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Chelsea Football
October 19, 2018
Chelsea blows the whistle on antisemitism