UN: Interpreter erred on IAF Syria raid

UN: Translator misinterpreted Syrian representative, who did not say IAF strike targeted a nuclear facility.

October 18, 2007 01:43
3 minute read.
UN: Interpreter erred on IAF Syria raid

iaf plane f-15i 29888idf. (photo credit: IDF)

The United Nations on Wednesday blamed an interpreter's error for an erroneous report that Syria claimed an Israeli air strike hit a Syrian nuclear facility, a mistake that made headlines in the Middle East and heightened concerns over Damascus' nuclear ambitions. Syria denied on Wednesday that one of its representatives told the UN General Assembly's committee that deals with disarmament on Tuesday that Israel had attacked a Syrian nuclear facility and added that "such facilities do not exist in Syria." The state-run Syrian Arab News Agency, SANA, quoting an unnamed Foreign Ministry source, said its representative was misquoted - and after more than seven hours of investigation the United Nations said that was indeed the case. "There was an interpretation error made yesterday when the First Committee was in session," UN associate spokesman Farhan Haq said. "There was no use of the word nuclear." "Although in English the interpreter had suggested that the Syrian delegate had referred to an attack on a nuclear facility, what he said was `like what happened on the 6th of September against my country,"' Haq said. The incident started Tuesday night with a UN press summary of the First Committee that paraphrased an unnamed Syrian representative as saying that "Israel was the fourth largest exporter of weapons of mass destruction and a violator of other nations' airspace, and it had taken action against nuclear facilities, including the 6 July attack in Syria." Israeli warplanes carried out an air strike in northeastern Syria near the border with Turkey on September 6, not July 6. The target remains unknown but widespread reports say it may have been a nascent nuclear facility, a claim Syria has denied. At UN headquarters in New York, the spokesman's office said Wednesday morning the Syrian representative spoke in Arabic. After several hours, Haq said the exact words of the English interpreter were: "An entity that is the fourth largest exporter of weapons of mass destruction in the world, an entity that violates other countries' airspace, and that takes action against nuclear facilities, including the attack on 6 July this year on a nuclear facility in my country - that entity has no right to lie, which it has done consistently." It took until late afternoon for the UN to issue the correct translation from the original Arabic words spoken by the Syrian representative. According to the corrected text, the Syrian delegate said: "...the (entity) that is ranking number four among the exporters of lethal weapons in the world; that which violates the airspace of sovereign states and carries out military aggression against them, like what happened on September 6 against my country, such entity with all those characteristics and even more, has no right for its representative to go on lying without shame..." The Syrian representative was replying to a speech to the committee on Monday by Israeli Ambassador Miriam Ziv, deputy director general for strategic affairs in the Foreign Ministry, who accused Syria of continuing to transfer weapons to Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon. According to the UN, the Syrian delegate accused Israel of planting "millions of cluster bombs in Lebanon" and refusing to hand over the relevant maps, of burying "nuclear wastes" in the occupied Palestinian territories, of building illegal settlements, and of trying "to change the identity of the Syrian territories" in the Golan Heights which Israel captured in the 1967 war. On Wednesday, before the UN announced the error, the Syrian representative demanded at the disarmament committee that the UN investigate how the mistake was made, suggesting that it was deliberate, and correct the record. Israeli radio stations, citing unidentified Israeli diplomats, on Wednesday quoted the Syrians as telling the UN meeting that a nuclear target had been struck. However, the Israeli radio reports did not say whether the Israeli diplomats had attended the session or merely had read the UN press release on the meeting. President Bashar Assad said earlier this month that the target was an "unused military building." Asked about the September 6 incident on Tuesday, before the erroneous report surfaced, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said "we have not received any concrete evidence and concrete information. We need to get more clear information."

Related Content

F35 Adir fighter jet
June 21, 2018
US F-35 diplomacy with Ankara puts Washington in Catch-22