US flag-burning law unites opposing party leaders

By
June 25, 2006 20:21

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Senate leaders in both parties said Sunday there is no need for a constitutional amendment to ban flag-burning, which the Senate plans to debate this week. Protecting the Constitution's First Amendment right to free speech takes precedent, agreed Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell and Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin, each their party's second-ranking Senate leader. Both said they would oppose the flag-burning amendment. "I think the First Amendment has served us well for over 200 years. I don't think it needs to be altered," McConnell said on ABC's "This Week."

Related Content

ireland
July 17, 2018
What Ireland's Boycott Bill Means For Israel

By CHARLES BYBELEZER/THE MEDIA LINE