Bipartisanship in US Senate may fracture over Iran sanctions

Future of controversial sanctions bill lies in the balance amid jockeying on the Hill.

January 29, 2014 01:12
2 minute read.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez.. (photo credit: REUTERS/Gary Cameron)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


WASHINGTON – While US President Barack Obama made final edits to his fifth State of the Union address on Tuesday, senior Senate aides relayed conflicting messages on the future of a key bill introduced last month threatening Iran with new sanctions should negotiations fail to dismantle its nuclear program.

Jockeying on the Hill reflected tense politics surrounding the future of the bill, which the president firmly opposes, warning that its passage through the Senate would derail talks between Iran and world powers.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

A bloc of 19 Democratic senators is protesting the bill, as are foreign allied dignitaries in London and Paris. However, 59 senators from both parties openly support the legislation, which gives the president up to a year to negotiate a comprehensive solution to the nuclear impasse before triggering new sanctions on Iran’s oil sector, upon presidential approval.

Proponents of the bill, written by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Robert Menendez (D-NJ), seek an “insurance policy” on Iran during the negotiations process, afraid that an interim deal that only temporarily halts Iran’s nuclear program might become a new status quo in the longstanding crisis.

A recent meeting of Senate Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), reportedly resulted in a decision not to proceed with the legislation, Reuters claimed on Tuesday.

Senators first returned to Washington yesterday after a ten-day recess, raising questions as to when the meeting would have taken place.

Senate aides from both parties familiar with the bill said they were unaware of such a meeting, or of whether a decision had been made on how to proceed, one way or another.


“The truth is that Republicans have been holding back to try to maintain the bipartisan support that we know this issue engenders across the nation,” one senior Republican Senate aide told The Jerusalem Post. “But if Leader Reid wishes to defy the will of the majority of the Senate and the majority of the American people, Republicans will be forced to take partisan steps to try to force a vote.”

For the most part, the politics of Iran are typically placid and bipartisan in Washington, with a steady 80 percent of Americans distrustful of the Islamic Republic and, in general, supportive of more sanctions than less.

But fewer than one in ten Americans considers foreign policy a priority. That will be reflected in the president’s speech Tuesday night, as he is unlikely to spend much time discussing the Middle East.

The White House hopes the issue can remain bipartisan, and insists Obama will support swift action on sanctions should talks fail in six months’ time.

The president has threatened to veto the bill should it pass through the Senate and reach his desk.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations