Ahmadinejad at nuclear ceremony in Tehran 390 (R).
(photo credit: REUTERS)
Containing Iran will be an arduous, protracted endeavor entailing massive
investments in military and financial resources, according to a report released
last week by a London-based think tank.
“The idea that containment is
somehow a low-cost option, or that containment doesn’t involve war, is a huge
mistake,” Sohrab Ahmari, the report’s author, told The Jerusalem Post from
“There is a clear conceptual difference between deterrence –
whether Iran would risk annihilation with a nuclear first strike against its
Arab rivals or Israel – and containment – namely making sure Iran can’t spread
its influence through overt and covert means,” Ahmari said.
people conflate deterrence and containment. Deterrence is one element of
containment, but it’s not everything,” he added.
A native of Tehran,
Ahmari has lived in the United States for over a decade and is currently is a
third-year law student at Northeastern University in Boston. His study, titled
“The Costs of Containment – The Mechanics of Restraining Iranian Expansionism,”
was released by the Henry Jackson Society, where the author is a non-resident
associate research fellow.
Ahmari said the monograph aims not to
prescribe a particular course of action but to clarify the terms of debate. “You
could infer from the report that rather than containment, other options –
including support for democratic forces seeking to topple the regime, or a
military operation that doesn’t just target nuclear sites but topples the regime
– might be a quicker way to deal with the problem once and for all,” he
Still, he said, even if the regime is overthrown by internal or
external pressure, Tehran would likely remain the Middle East’s chief source of
instability for the foreseeable future.
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
Writing in the cover piece of
this month’s Commentary
magazine, Ahmari warned that the power struggle
following the collapse of the Islamic Republic could destabilize the region for
a generation or more.
With some 663,000 battle-ready personnel –
including the Revolutionary Guards and Basij militia – Iran far outranks its
Arab rivals in military manpower, and in addition to its suspected
nuclear-weapons program owns vast stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons.
Over the three decades since the country’s Islamic Revolution, Iran has actively
supported militant Shi’ite movements in Lebanon, Iraq, the Persian Gulf and
South America and, more recently, Sunni extremist groups in the Palestinian
territories and Afghanistan.
The report said successful Western
containment would have to treat Iran’s destabilizing activity in each of those
arenas as a red line, and respond with force if necessary.
possession of nuclear weapons on both sides of the Cold War did not mitigate the
violence of these outbreaks of armed conflict; it merely increased the
likelihood of catastrophic outcomes,” he wrote. “Imposing a containment regime
on the Islamic Republic of Iran – a state far more insecure than the Soviet
Union was through most of its history – will yield similar outbreaks of armed
Ultimately, Ahmari told the Post
, confronting Iran is a matter
of choosing between a number of potentially dangerous
“We’re in the world of bad options,” he said.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>