Former MI chief Yadlin cautions over Iran's plutonium program

Amos Yadlin warns Iran is pursuing parallel track to a nuclear bomb, a feat that may be feasible without being detected.

August 9, 2013 15:05
2 minute read.
Amos Yadlin

Amos Yadlin 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Former Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin warned Friday that the West's one dimensional perception of Iran's nuclear program, focusing solely on the uranium enrichment path to a nuclear weapon, could enable the Islamic Republic to build a plutonium bomb without detection.

In an op-ed article Yadlin penned for The New York Times together with Avner Golov of the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University, he argued that uranium enrichment is one of only three dimensions to Iran's nuclear strategy, a fact that those who enter into negotiations with Iran must take into account.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

"A second dimension is Iran’s progress toward a quick 'breakout capability' through the stockpiling of large quantities of low-enriched uranium that could be further enriched rapidly to provide weapons-grade fuel. Third, Iran also appears to be pursuing a parallel track to a nuclear capability through the production of plutonium. If there is going to be a nuclear deal with Iran, all three parts of its strategy must be addressed," Yadlin and Golov warned.

Iran's heavy-water reactor being built in Arak could become operational next year, a move that would allow it to make serious progress toward a plutonium-fueled weapon, the article stated.

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

"A functioning nuclear reactor in Arak could eventually allow Iran to produce sufficient quantities of plutonium for nuclear bombs," Yadlin and Golov said, adding that Western negotiators should demand the Arak reactor be shut down.

"This is crucial because the West would likely seek to avoid an attack on a 'hot' reactor, lest it cause widespread environmental damage. Once Arak is operational, it would effectively be immune from attack and the West would be deprived of its primary 'stick' in its efforts to persuade Iran to forgo a military nuclear capability."


Yadlin and Golov stated that even Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, the most outspoken supporter of harsh action against Iran's nuclear program, related solely to the uranium enrichment track when he presented his "red line" at the UN General Assembly last year.

"Of the three countries that have publicly crossed the nuclear threshold since the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty entered into force in 1970, two — India and North Korea — did so via the plutonium track. In order to deny Iran this route, any agreement between the West and Iran must guarantee that Iran will not retain a breakout or 'sneak out' plutonium-production capacity," they posited.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations