'Iran producing less nuclear fuel than expected'

UN nuclear agency praises Teheran for "a significant step forward" in explaining atomic actions.

By
August 30, 2007 16:12
4 minute read.
iran nuclear 298.88

iran nuclear 224.88. (photo credit: AP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The UN nuclear agency said Thursday that Iran was producing less nuclear fuel than expected and praised Teheran for "a significant step forward" in explaining past atomic actions that have raised suspicions. The report is expected to make it more difficult for the United States to rally support for a new round of sanctions against Teheran. At the same time, the report confirmed that Iran continued to expand its uranium enrichment program, reflecting the Islamic republic's defiance of the UN Security Council. Still, UN officials said, both enrichment and the building of a plutonium-producing reactor was continuing more slowly than expected. International Atomic Energy Agency Deputy Director General Olli Heinonen, who brokered the cooperation deal with Iran, highlighted the importance of the agreement, noting that Teheran's past refusal to answer the IAEA's questions triggered Security Council sanctions in the first place. But he cautioned that Iran still needed to fully implement its commitments, telling reporters that "the key is that Iran ... provides the information that we need" in a time frame that results in clarity about Iran's past suspicious activities by year's end. There was no immediate US comment. But France, a close US ally on Iran, said cooperation by Teheran was not enough to eliminate the threat of new UN penalties. "As long as there is not a clear ... decision from Iran about the suspension of activities linked to enrichment, we will pursue ... looking into a third sanctions resolution," French Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Pascale Andreani said in Paris. Drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, much of the confidential report obtained by The Associated Press focused on the already publicized action plan finalized just a few weeks ago between the agency and Iran, restating progress in some areas and time frames for Iran to respond to additional questions. In that plan, Iran agreed to come up to answer the final questions from agency experts by November. If that and all other deadlines are met and Iran provides all the information sought, the agency should be able to close the file on its more than four-year investigation of Teheran's nuclear activities by year's end, a senior UN official said. He and other UN officials - all speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment to media - declined to comment, however, on whether a clean bill that banishes suspicions about Iran's former nuclear programs and experiments would be enough to derail the threat of new UN sanctions. The United States and its closest allies said more were needed because of Teheran's defiance of council demands that it mothball its uranium enrichment program and stop building a plutonium-producing reactor. Both can create the product that can serve as the fissile component of nuclear warheads. Like the joint plan on cooperation between Iran and the agency, the report - to be considered by the 35-nation IAEA board at a meeting starting Sept. 10 - said the agency felt that information provided by Iran on past small-scale plutonium experiments had "resolved" agency concerns about the issue. In Teheran, the official Islamic Republic News Agency cited senior nuclear official Mohammad Saeedi as saying that conclusion "ended all the baseless US accusations against Iran over reprocessing plutonium." The agency report also noted cooperation on other issues, while specifying that Teheran still needed to satisfy the agency's curiosity about its enrichment technology and traces of highly enriched uranium at a facility linked to the military. The report also said Iran agreed to study documentation from the agency on the "Green Salt Project" - a plan that the US alleges links diverse components of a nuclear weapons program including uranium enrichment, high explosives testing and a missile re-entry vehicle. Diplomats told the AP last year that the agency was made aware of the alleged program by US intelligence. One of the UN officials suggested the IAEA might share its confidential documents - possibly including secret US information - with Iran in its investigation of the "Green Salt Project," but declined to offer details. As expected, the report also confirmed that, while Iran continued to expand its uranium enrichment program, it was doing so much more slowly than expected, and had produced only negligible amounts of nuclear fuel that was far below the level usable for nuclear warheads. One of the UN officials also noted that construction of the plutonium-producing reactor at the city of Arak had slowed in recent months. He said that "design difficulties, getting equipment, materials and components, and fuel technology, plus perhaps some political considerations," could be causing the delay. The allusion to "political considerations" appeared linked to reports that Iranian officials might be considering stopping construction of the Arak reactor in another sign of good will calculated to blunt the threat of new UN sanctions. Citing unidentified Iranian sources, Jane's Defense Weekly earlier this week said some members of Iran's Supreme National Security Council were pushing for such a move. That - along with the months-long slowdown in enrichment activity, plus significant Iranian readiness to cooperate with the IAEA investigation - could combine to stymie the US-led push for new UN penalties, diplomats said.

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB