'Iran strike could spare world a very real threat'

Carefully managed strike could improve long-term national security of US, ex-Pentagon adviser tells 'Foreign Affairs.'

By JPOST.COM STAFF
December 25, 2011 13:48
1 minute read.
Isfahan uranium conversion facility

Isfahan uranium conversion facility 311. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A military strike on Iran could spare the region and the world a very real threat and dramatically improve the long-term national security of the United States, analyst Matthew Kroenig of Georgetown University said recently in an article published by Foreign Affairs magazine.

The former Pentagon adviser writes about US authorities who broke up a plot in October by two men linked to the Iranian government to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in the United States. The episode further escalated tensions between Tehran and Washington.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
Israeli surveillance gear sent to Iran
Iran navy starts 10-day wargame in Strait of Hormuz

Kroenig, who highlights that the Obama administration has not publicly threatened to retaliate with military force, said that those skeptical of military action fail to appreciate the true danger that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose to US interests in the Middle East and beyond.

He said that critics of a bombing campaign maintain that if sanctions and diplomacy fail to impede Tehran’s progress, the United States should simply "learn to live with a nuclear Iran."

In the article, Kroenig warned that it is dangerous to assume that the consequences of a US attack on Iran would be even worse than Iran achieving its nuclear ambitions.

He claimed that military strike, if carefully managed, "could spare the region and the world a very real threat and dramatically improve the long-term national security of the United States."

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB