US House mulls measure against Iran containment

As congressmen debate resolution for stricter Iran policy, influential think tank advises against Israeli, US attack on Iran.

By JTA
May 16, 2012 12:18
3 minute read.
United States Capitol Building

United States Capitol Building Congress 390. (photo credit: Thinkstock/Imagebank)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

WASHINGTON - The US House of Representatives  debated a resolution that rejects containment of a nuclear Iran on Tuesday evening.

The non-binding resolution "strongly supports United States policy to prevent the government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability, rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran; and urges the president to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to the Iranian nuclear threat."

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


US President Barack Obama has in recent months made explicit his opposition to "containment" and his preference for "prevention."

The resolution, introduced by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), the chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has 314 sponsors. The House did not immediately vote on the resolution, rolling over debate until Wednesday.

A similar bill in the Senate, introduced by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has 74 co-sponsors but has yet to be introduced to the floor.

The House resolution was debated under suspension rules, meaning that there was no opportunity to amend it.

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat



Americans for Peace Now had urged Congress members in a letter to amend the resolution to make explicit that it did not authorize use of force and to substitute "acquisition of weapons" for "acquiring a nuclear capability." APN argued that "capability" is too vague a term to establish a "red line" triggering military action.

Israel's "red line" is nuclear capability, and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's government has been seeking the same commitment from the Obama administration. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful civilian purposes. The status of its suspected nuclear weapons program is not precisely known, although in recent days some reports have suggested that the Iranians have achieved the capability to manufacture weapons.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) urged the US and Israel on Monday to align their "red lines" on what would trigger a military strike on Iran, The Hill newspaper reported.

McCain, speaking to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, did not elaborate on what the "red lines" should be.

Influential think tank advises against Israeli or US attack on Iran

A report released Tuesday by the Rand Corporation, a think tank that has strong Pentagon ties, strongly recommended against an Israeli or US military strike on Iran and suggested that containment, while "dangerous", would be preferable.

"An Israeli or American attack on Iranian nuclear facilities would make it more, not less, likely that the Iranian regime would decide to produce and deploy nuclear weapons. Such an attack would also make it more, not less, difficult to contain Iranian influence," it said. "To prevent the rivalry between Israel and Iran from escalating into armed conflict, the United States should continue to discourage an Israeli military strike while strengthening Israeli capabilities in preparation for a future in which Iran may have managed to acquire nuclear weapons. US leaders should bolster security cooperation and intelligence sharing with Israel while maintaining pressure on Iran, thus weakening its capacity to project power and fueling the debate within Iran over nuclear weapons."

Separately, the US Senate passed an amendment to a bill reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank Act that would ban any assistance to companies that violate Iran sanctions.

In a press release, the amendment's sponsors, Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), said that under its provisions, $900 million provided in 2007-2008 by the bank in loan guarantees and other assistance to Reliance Industries in India would not have been possible, as that company sells refined petroleum products to Iran.

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB