Third times not a charm: NGO petitions to High Court to strike down migrant policy 3.0

Court had told the state in September it must close the Holot open detention center within 90 days.

December 18, 2014 18:26
2 minute read.
detention center

African migrants walk in front of the entrance to Holot open detention center in the Negev . (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Following an NGO petition on Thursday to the High Court of Justice to strike down the state’s recently enacted third shot at an African migrant policy, the same court immediately froze the policy pending a decision on its constitutionality.

The court had told the state in September it must close the Holot open detention center within 90 days and froze aspects of the limits on the movement of illegal migrants under the old policy.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The latest policy shortened the maximum amount of time migrants can be detained in each facility and changed some aspects of their detention conditions.

It allows for migrants to be held in the Holot open detention center for a maximum of 20 months, as opposed to the previous version in which they could be detained indefinitely.

At the closed Saharonim detention center, it allows for migrants to be held for a maximum of three months as opposed to a year in the previous version.

In addition, whereas detainees were ordered to sign in three times a day at Holot, the present draft calls on them to sign in just once a day.

While that change somewhat frees-up migrants’ movement, there are still elaborate prohibitions and sanctions designed to prevent migrants from finding employment.

The policy appears to be an attempt to find a middle ground between what the High Court seemed to suggest and what recently resigned interior minister Gideon Sa’ar sought.

The High Court appeared to suggest a policy based more on integrating migrants than on extended detention periods to deter them from staying in the country. Sa’ar had said he wanted a two-year detention period in Holot and around eight months in Saharonim.

The former interior minister and many other politicians said the court’s September ruling undermined a policy that had been effective in dealing with the illegal migrant population, which had dropped to 48,212 as of June 30 – around 10,000 fewer than it was at its height a few years ago.

The Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, who filed the petition, had slammed the changes, saying it was too bad that the government was once again ignoring the High Court’s directive to get rid of detention as a primary aspect and tool of the law.

In the court’s September majority opinion by Justice Uzi Vogelman, he said that in the crucial debate over whether the migrants are here for economic reasons or to escape persecution the court could not ignore that the state was not forcing migrants to go back.

There is at least a serious concern of persecution for Eritreans and the Sudanese are not being sent back because of the lack of diplomatic relations with Sudan, he said.

When it was recently initially leaked, the policy failed to appease the Israeli Immigration Policy Center, which stated that the maximum 20-month sentence at Holot would not fulfill the purpose of the law of “deterring new infiltrators and causing the independent exit of infiltrators already in Israel.”

Related Content

Rami Feinstein
August 18, 2018
Music from the heart