A blueprint for governing Israel

The report's repercussions ripple far wider than the singular event - the war - that was its catalyst.

By GIORA EILAND
May 1, 2007 04:20
1 minute read.
eiland 298 aj

eiland 248.88 . (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

I want to leave aside personal politics - the suitability of this minister, the hastiness of that one. That's not my field. What is important to me is to stress that the Winograd Report is the most serious study ever of one of the most vital issues: how the State of Israel is run. It's much much more serious, and of much higher quality, for instance, than the Agranat Commission of Inquiry into the Yom Kippur War. It has put its finger on two central points. The question now is whether and how its findings will be implemented.

THE WINOGRAD REPORT: SPECIAL COVERAGE
The first point relates to the way the government conducts its discussions - the absence of a staff, the absence of a system. The report highlights, and urges the necessary steps to correct the situation which sees the government functioning in the political-security arena without its own staff: The most important body in the country is without its own staff to enable it to effectively grapple with the most important issues! The second point relates to the relationship between the political and the security echelons, and suggests how it should work. This is a vital reform. The government can't possibly be capable of taking the appropriate decisions if it does not fully understand, for instance, the IDF's capabilities. If the cabinet only meets to weigh decisions when there's a crisis, it's like a board of directors that only gets together when the company is about to go bankrupt. Now it may be that the recommendations in the report are not sufficiently concrete, but the pointers are certainly there. Since the government is so anxious to stay away from the personal conclusions in the report, it is enthusiastically embracing these professional recommendations. So maybe, out of all of this, something good will come. The writer is a former head of the National Security Council.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN