Beinisch slams state on W. Bank road

Says state did nothing to prevent violation of court order.

By DAN IZENBERG
May 27, 2010 02:20
1 minute read.
Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch

dorit beinisch 311 Ariel Jerozolimski. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch blasted the state on Wednesday over the the fact that a interim injunction the court issued on April 5, 2009, ordering a halt to construction of a road built partly on private Palestinian land, was violated and the state did nothing to prevent it.

Beinisch made her remarks during a hearing on an action by Yesh Din – Volunteers for Human Rights, which petitioned the court in March 2009, demanding that the state implement orders issued by the Civil Administration of Judea and Samaria to demolish the illegal road.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


According to Yesh Din attorney Shlomi Zecharya, the petition was filed after the route had been laid out but before it was paved. The petitioners also said the road cut off access from farmers from the Palestinian village of Karyut to 1,500 dunams (150 hectares) of farmland.

The road is meant to link the illegal Hayovel outpost to the nearby Eli settlement.

In April 2009, the court issued an interim injunction ordering a halt to all work on the road. Nevertheless, construction continued and part of the road was paved. In fact, the paved part of the road is currently being used by the army despite the military administration’s order to demolish it.

“If the Hayovel outpost is illegal, and we know it is, and if the land is privately owned, how is it possible to pave a road on it,” Beinisch asked.

The state’s representative, Hila Gorney, said that only part of the road was privately owned and that the ownership status of another section was in dispute and had not been resolved. She said the army had to make use of this part of the road, which was not privately owned.



When she was asked about another road nearby that could serve the same purpose, Gorney informed the court that it no longer existed.

“Things are happening right in front of your eyes, Justice Esther Hayut said. “You have such sophisticated sight equipment in the area and yet you don’t see what is going on there. When one road causes injury to private property, the solution must be found elsewhere. How can it be that there was another access road and now there is not?”

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN