Canada tries to end annual UN ritual

Canada will be voting against three anti-Israel resolutions in December.

By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER
December 4, 2005 02:08
2 minute read.
israel at un empty chair 224 88

israel un chair 224 88. (photo credit: Courtesy)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Israeli officials and Canadian Jewish leaders welcomed Canada's decision to vote against three of the slew of anti-Israel resolutions annually voted on at the United Nations at the beginning of December. Canada questioned the language of resolutions that "creates a sense of imbalance, and seems to suggest that it is only Israel that has obligations," as well as the use of "emotive and provocative language in place of the straight facts," in a speech given by Canada's deputy UN ambassador Gilbert Laurin at the UN last week. He explained that Canada would be voting against three resolutions dealing with Israel, including one on the "peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine" for not including "a stronger and more unequivocal condemnation of suicide bombing," and another on the "Syrian Golan" for placing "the onus of responsibility for renewed negotiations on Israel only." The negative votes came a year after Canada first decided to change its UN policy by voting against four similar resolutions, a move which came as part of a comprehensive review of its votes on Israel at the international body that the government had indicated it would undertake. It joins the United States and a handful of other countries in its opposition to the 20 or so resolutions concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict renewed at this time of year. In the past, Canada generally abstained or even supported these resolutions, as Europe does. "We view these changes favorably. We're thankful the Canadian government has rethought some of its attitudes," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said, noting that at the UN generally countries have been "more attentive" to Israel's concerns than in the past. And Shimon Fogel, CEO of the Canada-Israel Committee, said, "From our perspective we see it as a very encouraging sign." He added that Canada was also trying to replace [by next year] the bevy of annual resolutions with a general "forward-looking" statement about the peace process. "If Canada's successful with this initiative, it will effectively end this annual anti-Israel ritual," he said. He noted that the move came after "a fair amount of encouragement from the pro-Israel community" for the government to overcome objections from Canadian Arabs, Muslims, and "bureaucrats" opposed to changing the policy.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN