Electionscape: TV ads a chance to change channels

Ads shown at different times on the three channels will likely reduce viewership.

March 7, 2006 00:03
3 minute read.
Electionscape: TV ads a chance to change channels

anshel pfeffer 298.88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Tuesday night's election broadcasts will be shown at different hours on all three main channels. If the last elections are anything to go by, instead of tripling the audience, it will just give people a chance to switch channels for some more serious fare. In the not so long ago days of the single channel, the broadcasts were an eagerly awaited event, the parties' jingles became national theme tunes and they had a considerable influence on voters' intentions. The old habits remained during the 1996 election, after the advent of Channel 2, and the Likud's shattered glass clips, showing Yasser Arafat leading an ashen-faced Shimon Peres, was attack politics like never seen here before and had a devastating effect on Labor's substantial lead. Ever since, however, the broadcasts' viewing ratings have plummeted and serious analysts belittle their influence. It's quite possible that Channel 10's Raviv Druker's scoop this week, showing Omri Sharon's diaries, detailing political appointments and other shady dealings, might prove to be much more damaging than anything Labor or Likud might throw at Ehud Olmert. Kadima's main asset, perhaps it sole one, is the aura of the leader in a coma. None of the parties dare say a bad word about Grandfather Arik, but the diaries find him guilty by association with his son and serve as a reminder of the rampant corruption during his tenure, and Olmert is also implicated. But the diminished influence hasn't prevented the parties from spending millions on their broadcasts, and to ensure a wider audience, all the parties invited the press to view their broadcasts, which were once kept under wraps before the big night. Labor especially has invested a huge portion of its limited budget on television - it's the last chance to try to portray Amir Peretz as a viable national leader. For that purpose, Labor last week opened its studio in Givatayim to reporters and camera crews so they could film Peretz encircled by Labor's top 10; the underlying message, if Ami Ayalon, Avishay Braverman and Shelly Yacimovich go for Peretz, so can the rest of us. In another corner of the studio, a mock study has been built as a backdrop for Peretz's fireside chats, replete with law books and framed photographs of him with world leaders. But a filming schedule on the wall emphasized one of Peretz's main problems, senior officers Ayalon and Binyamin Ben-Eliezer were slated to appear in the "security film," Peretz wasn't needed. But the main question for the party's strategists isn't how to highlight their candidates' strengths, but whom to attack. In past campaigns the answer was clear, Likud and Labor slugged it out, while the far-right attacked Likud for not being right enough, and Meretz did the same for Labor from the left. The haredim and Shinui demonized each other. But this time, most parties are up against their traditional enemies and also Kadima, and they have to decide where to concentrate fire. Olmert's list is the one to beat. The Likud isn't going to waste much time on Peretz, so Olmert is in for an all-out attack. Kadima will be giving as good as it gets, and the Netanyahu-Olmert fight is going to turn bloody. Labor's dilemma is how to attack Binyamin Netanyahu's financial record without helping its bigger rival. Its strategy will be to try to tar the two with the same brush, as cigar-smoking, poverty-ignoring capitalists. It will be interesting to see how smaller parties eager to sit in the next coalition will be careful not to anger Olmert too much. Shas has already decided to run a poverty-centered campaign and blame its one-time ally Netanyahu. Meretz's and Israel Beiteinu's broadcasts likewise will go easy on Olmert and look for other targets. Despite Kadima's bad fortune over the last few weeks, they still reckon that an Olmert government is a foregone conclusion and they want in.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town