HCJ slammed for taking Amona petition

Peace Now argues that settlers' petition is merely a delaying tactic.

By DAN IZENBERG
January 19, 2006 01:40
1 minute read.
amona 298.88

amona aerial view 248.88. (photo credit: Peace Now)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Peace Now activist Dror Etkes blasted the High Court of Justice on Wednesday for allowing residents of the illegally built houses in the Amona outpost one week to file a petition against demolition orders issued by the military government in the West Bank 15 months ago. "The court is making a mockery of everyone, itself, the State Attorney's Office, Peace Now and even the settlers," Etkes told The Jerusalem Post after the court issued its ruling. "It's obvious that the settlers' request to file a petition is nothing more than a delaying tactic to prevent the demolition of the houses." Peace Now filed the original petition against the government on July 5, 2005, demanding that it carry out the decision it first made in October 2004 to demolish the illegal housing. The court held a hearing on Wednesday to consider a request by occupants of the houses to be added as respondents to the petition. Had the court agreed, the occupants would have had the chance to argue against the Peace Now petition. Instead, however, a panel of three justices - Supreme Court President Aharon Barak and Justices Edmond Levy and Esther Hayut - made two decisions. First, it decided to reject the Peace Now petition on the grounds that the government had made it clear it intended to demolish the illegal structures very shortly. Secondly, it ordered the government to refrain from demolishing the buildings for one week, thus giving the settlers time to file their own petition against the demolitions. Etkes charged that the settlers had had many months to file a petition against the orders issued by the military government, first to stop the illegal construction and then to demolish it. "They didn't do it before because they had nothing to say to the court to justify their case," Etkes said. "They don't have anything today, either." He charged that the court had given the settlers a week for "political" reasons, to appease them. "It's obvious to everyone that what motivated the court was its concern that the radical right wing was trying to delegitimize it," he said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN