High Court okays route of fence near Maccabim

Panel of three justices rules that route of fence properly balances Israeli, Palestinian needs.

January 9, 2006 22:56
1 minute read.

jib.awards.298.vote. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The government chalked up a victory on Monday when the High Court of Justice rejected two petitions protesting for opposite reasons the route of the separation fence between Maccabim-Reut and the Palestinian village of Beit Sira and lifted the interim injunction blocking construction. A panel of three justices headed by Supreme Court President Aharon Barak ruled that the route of the fence properly balanced the security needs of the Israeli population and the quality of life and well-being of the Palestinians. "We are satisfied that in the circumstances the decisions of the military commander fell within the realm of reasonability pertinent to these issues," wrote Barak. "The military commander's decision came after he had weighed all of the relevant information and in accordance with the standards established by this court in the guideline decisions it has handed down in connection with the fence." One of the petitions was submitted by the village council of Beit Sira and residents of Beit Sira and Shukba, who charged that the military government had confiscated Palestinian-owned land to build the fence and had left some of the village's farmland on the Israeli side of the fence. Meanwhile, residents of Maccabim-Reut protested that the route was too close to their homes and that terrorists could hit houses on the eastern edge of the villages with light weapons. The Defense Ministry changed the proposed route after the landmark Beit Surik ruling of July 2004, which established the principle that Israeli security needs must be properly balanced against the well-being of the Palestinian population. In that case, the court ruled that 30 kilometers of a 40-km. segment must be rerouted to ease the hardship caused to the Palestinians. As a result, the section of the fence in the Beit Sira area was moved substantially closer to the Green Line and Maccabim-Reut. Barak wrote that in establishing the new fence route, "it is obvious that the state made an effort to reduce the harm to the Palestinian residents, while at the same time trying to achieve its security goals."

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town