High Court rejects Winograd petitions

Beinisch: C'tee can make own decision on personal recommendations and needn't send warnings.

November 27, 2007 10:45
1 minute read.
dorit beinisch 88 298

beinisch 224.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Winograd Committee is not required to send advance warning letters to those who would be harmed by the conclusions in its final report, the High Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday, rejecting a petition by the Military Defender's Office. Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch wrote in the ruling that since the court could not determine, at this stage, the degree of harm that those mentioned in the report would incur, it could not possibly rule on whether those parties could have a right to protest before the report's publication. In addition, the court rejected a petition by the Movement for Quality Government to require the committee to make personal recommendations. Beinisch declared that it was the committee's responsibility to make such decisions. Recently, the Winograd Committee announced that it would not publish facts, conclusions or recommendations that stood to harm any individual who held a senior position during the Second Lebanon War. The announcement caused controversy because it meant that no one could defend himself in case the committee did, indeed, criticize individuals, while others were annoyed that the committee would not call for punishing those found responsible for the war's failures. The final report is scheduled to come out in the next few weeks. Dan Izenberg contributed to this report.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town