High Court to rule on Winograd report

Five judges will decide when war committee's protocols will be published.

April 18, 2007 09:23
1 minute read.
High Court to rule on Winograd report

winograd members 298 gpo. (photo credit: GPO)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A panel of five judges, headed by Supreme Court President Chief Justice Dorit Beinisch, is expected to publish on Wednesday its decision on the release date for the Winograd Committee protocols of testimonies by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Amir Peretz and former chief of General Staff Dan Halutz, as well as the committee members. The committee was set up after the Second Lebanon War to examine the performance of the IDF and the OC Home front Command during the fighting. The committee wanted to release its weekly protocols only after presenting its interim report, but MK Zehava Gal-On (Meretz), petitioned the High Court of Justice, demanding the transcripts of testimonies given to the committee be released immediately. Gal-On's attorney, Dafna Holz-Lechner, said that "making the testimonies public is a matter of national importance."

  • Analysis: Winograd members not resigning - yet
  • Analysis: The battle for Beinisch's authority Winograd Committee members have repeatedly rejected demands to release the testimonies, saying that that the work of preparing the interim report, coupled with a tight schedule interrupted by the Pessah holiday, prevented them from examining the testimonies to check whether parts of them should be censored for national security reasons. A political scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Prof. Shlomo Avineri, was quoted by Army Radio on Wednesday as saying that the committee should be allowed a better work environment. "It is impossible for a committee appointed for such a serious undertaking to be constantly pressured by MKs or by the High Court," Avineri said. On Tuesday, tensions between Winograd Committee members and the High Court mounted when members of the committee threatened to resign if its protocols were released by power of a court ruling before the committee scanned the testimonies.

  • Related Content

    Jisr az-Zarq
    April 3, 2014
    Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town