Human rights organizations: 'IDF playing Russian roulette in Gaza'

By DAN IZENBERG
April 16, 2006 23:19
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Six Israeli and Palestinian human rights organizations on Sunday petitioned the High Court of Justice to instruct the army to cancel an order reducing the "safety margin" for IDF artillery and tank gunners from 300 meters to 100 meters from civilian targets in the Gaza Strip. Attorney Michael Sfard, who is representing the petitioners, asked the court for an immediate hearing to prevent any more Palestinian casualties due to the army's new policy, which was allegedly introduced to stop Kassam attacks by Palestinian terrorists against targets inside Israel. However, Supreme Court Justice Asher Grunis gave the state a week to reply and did not set a time for the court hearing despite the petitioners' request. In the petition, Sfard charged that "the army is playing Russian roulette with the lives of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip by deliberately including them within the firing range. The question of whether civilians, including entire families, will be harmed depends on variables over which the army has no control." The petitioners include Physicians for Human Rights, B'Tselem, The Gaza Community Mental Health Program, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel and Al Mezan Center for Human Rights. The decision to reduce the safety range was first reported in the press and was not refuted by the army, Sfard charged. He wrote that the fallout from ricochets and bomb fragments is 100 meters from the spot where a shell falls and that the normal "range of error" from a planned target is at least 20 meters. The change in the safety range from 300 to 100 meters caused last week's bombing of a Gaza Strip home which killed seven-year-old Hadil Ghaban and wounded 12 members of her family, Sfard charged. He added that dozens of shells had fallen close to Palestinian homes during recent IDF bombardments. According to Sfard, the army's policy violates international humanitarian law, which calls on it to make a clear distinction between fighters and civilians, to keep its response to an attack within proper proportions, and to use force with caution.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN