IDF will find alternatives to 'human shields'

Source: Last week's High Court ban will "directly affect outcome of military operations."

By
October 10, 2005 03:10
2 minute read.
IDF will find alternatives to 'human shields'

tough idf soldiers 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Last week's High Court of Justice ruling barring the army from using Palestinians as human shields during IDF operations to extricate wanted terrorists from their hideouts will force the army to come up with alternatives for minimizing the risk to soldiers, an IDF source said Sunday. "The new situation created by the court ruling will directly affect the outcome of military operations," the source said. Chief Justice Aharon Barak said that the procedures adopted by the army to combat terror since the outbreak of the second intifada were a flagrant violation of international law. Barak wrote in the ruling that "you cannot exploit the civilian population for the army's military needs, and you cannot force them to collaborate with the army." While the army was unable to provide statistics for the number of Palestinian fatalities caused by use as human shields or "volunteers," the source insisted that the numbers were low. The source recalled one instance from August 2002 when IDF forces used Nidal Mukhsan to enter a house in the Nablus village of Tubas to ascertain if it was empty. Outfitted by soldiers with a helmet and flak jacket, Mukhsan entered the house and was shot and killed by wanted Hamas commander Nasser Jarrar who mistook Mukhsan for a soldier. As condemnation by human rights organizations grew over the procedures used by the army, it was forced to adopt an alternative. In December 2002, the army established the "early warning procedure," which has resulted in no Palestinian deaths or casualties so far, the source said. The procedure's guidelines hold that soldiers could only request the assistance of a Palestinian resident of the specific building that was the target of an IDF raid, and under no circumstances could it force the person to implement the request. Also, the procedure could only be used in a non-battle zone and only at a site where there was no military equipment, the source said. According to the human rights organization B'tselem, last week's ruling came as a result of a petition filed in May 2002 by seven humans rights organizations. On its Web site, B'tselem cites 10 instances where the army used Palestinians as human shields between 2002 and 2004.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN