'IDF's policymaking role exaggerated'

Academic experts say gov't, diplomatic bodies should determine foreign policy.

June 5, 2006 15:05
1 minute read.
dan halutz clenches his fists 298

halutz fists 298 AJ. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Does the IDF have too much influence over matters of state and government policy? According to an expert participating in a conference, entitled "A Military with a State?", at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem on Monday, the unusually high status the army maintains in society grants it an undemocratic and exaggerated level of influence over negotiations with the Palestinian Authority and overall government policy. "The entire system operates in an undemocratic fashion," said Prof. Gabriel Sheffer, one of the organizers of the two-day conference. The IDF's function as the official state appraiser of diplomatic situations and its deep involvement in peace negotiations, he said, has restricted civilian and political bodies, such as the Knesset and Foreign Ministry, from taking over these functions. Immediately following the state's establishment, Sheffer said, the IDF was granted a key role in all state functions due to the dire security situation. In 1967, he said, the situation got worse following the Six Day War, whose 39th anniversary the conference marked. Historians from England, the US and France participated. Generals, Sheffer said, continued to contribute to the IDF's domination over Israeli society even after they completed their military service, since they traditionally took up key posts in the civilian and political echelon while continuing to apply a military way of thinking. In comparison to other Western and developed countries, he said, the IDF had an "irregular status and influence" over the diplomatic and political echelons. The National Security Council, Knesset and Foreign Ministry, Sheffer said, were the types of government bodies that were more suited to deal with peace talks and formulating government policy. "The situation today is that the Knesset has barely any influence over state policy," he said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town