Justice Ministry defends Lador appointment

Ministry backs Lador following probe into foul play during a previous position.

November 14, 2007 23:38
1 minute read.
Justice Ministry defends Lador appointment

moshe lador 248 88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Former district attorney Moshe Lador had informed the search committee appointed to recommend a new state attorney that a labor court had accused him of signing a false affidavit in a case before it, the Justice Ministry said Wednesday. The committee took the matter into account before recommending him to the cabinet as the best man for the job. "Even though no one filed an objection against Lador's candidacy, the labor court ruling was brought before the committee and taken into consideration before a decision was made," Justice Ministry Spokesman Moshe Cohen said in the statement. Cohen added that outgoing State Attorney Eran Shendar ordered an investigation into the incident as soon as the labor court ruling was handed down. According to the statement, the court found that Lador had been involved in an office foul-up, albeit a serious one, which was caused by the grave failure of a state prosecutor. Lador did not deliberately mislead the court and his personal honesty was never in doubt, read the Justice Ministry statement. The incident under discussion involved a lawsuit filed by Shlomo Brovender, who had held a senior position in the National Infrastructure Ministry between 1996 and 2001. He sued the ministry in labor court, asking it to recognize his salary, pension rights and other benefits. The state prosecution did not submit a defense brief, and did not honor the court's decision to pay the plaintiff his money. In 2003, Brovender petitioned the High Court of Justice to order the government to pay up. Lador wrote an affidavit saying he had not known about the case and that he had only learned about the details when he discussed the matter with the High Court Section of the State Attorney's Office which was preparing the state's case. However, Lador had signed documents regarding the case before handing them over to the lawyer who was supposed to be in charge of it. On that basis, the court found that he had not told the truth. However, the search committee maintained that even though he had signed the documents, he was not familiar with them. This was only natural in a system where he has to sign so many documents before sending them on to individual attorneys. "Lador did not deliberately try to mislead the court and his honesty and integrity were never held in doubt,' the Justice Ministry added.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town