katzav pointing 311.
(photo credit: Courtesy)
The state has accused former president Moshe Katsav of carefully targeting women
he sought to seduce during his years in high office, adjusting his approach to
fit each one’s character, according to the introduction to a written summary of
its case before the Tel Aviv District Court.
RELATED:Katsav's lawyers ask to step downAvoiding an untenable precedent on Katsav
The introductions to the
summaries of the prosecution and defense were released on Tuesday. All of the
trial’s sessions were held behind closed doors, and the minutes of only one were
released to the public.
The trial began with the reading of the
indictment on May 14, 2009.
“From the testimony we have heard, it clearly
emerges that the defendant regarded the women who were subordinate to him as a
reservoir from which he chose some as sexual objects,” wrote the prosecutors,
Ronit Amiel and Nissim Marom. “From the moment he saw that they suited his
sexual purposes, he took advantage of his senior position and status in the
offices in which he served, as well as the obligations of these women to be near
him and to obey him in the context of fulfilling their duties.”
described how Katsav allegedly tried to snare his prey.
tried to seek and find the specific strategy whereby he could advance his sexual
goals with each of the women who worked for him,” it charged. “Usually, this
included giving demonstrative and flattering attention aimed at capturing the
heart of whoever served as the target for satisfying his sexual
“He also gave backing to his victims, compared with the other
employees in the office, which increased their relative status... in the office
he controlled, while he, all the time, was scheming to have his way with
Katsav’s lawyers – Avigdor Feldman, Zion Amir and Avi Lavie –
compared Marom to a chief inquisitor judging the case according to an axiom that
he cannot prove and which, in the end, turns out to be false.
in this case, they said, was that the key prosecution witness – whom the
president is accused of having raped twice – did not fit the description of a
woman who spreads lies and makes up stories, and that therefore the witness’s
version of the events must be true, even if this was contradicted by the facts
and Marom failed to resolve the contradictions.
To prove their point, the
lawyers quoted from a statement made by Marom to the court during the trial, in
which he said, “In a situation where there are problems with the evidence, the
court should ask itself whether there is any possibility that the witness made
up the story. The answer is no.
That means there must be some other
reasonable possibility to explain the evidence.”
The lawyers referred
briefly to one case in which, according to the records of the Shin Bet (Israel
Security Agency), the amount of time available to the tourism minister – the
position Katsav held at the time, in 1998 – would have been insufficient for him
to perpetrate one of the rapes of which he was accused.
charged that the prosecution had no explanation for this or other problems
arising from the facts, and that according to its approach, one would have to
wait for the messiah to come to find the answer.
Katsav’s lawyers also
blasted the media and others, including Labor MK Shelly Yacimovich, for
determining their client’s guilt before the trial even started.
trampling of the defendant, which deviates from all social, public and legal
standards, knows no bounds,” they wrote. “Until this very day, this wicked mill
continues to rake his flesh with iron combs.”
They added that the
prosecution itself had tried to demonize Katsav during the trial.