Lindenstrauss blasts public corruption

Calls for tougher judicial action hours after Mazuz ruling on Sharon case.

November 17, 2005 21:57
4 minute read.
sharon at un 298.88

sharon at un 298.88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The State Comptroller, judge Micha Lindenstrauss, said in a November conference of the Law Faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that "We must increase the punishment for public corruption - trial and harsh punishment are the orders of the day." At the conference, which was held in advance of a new book by the former state comptroller Miriam Ben-Porat, Lindenstrauss even called for Attorney-General Menahem Mazuz, to appeal on past rulings. "If the punishment does not satisfy the public interest, this is the role of the Attorney-General to exercise his authority to appeal the decision." "It does not stand to reason that the standards of punishment would stay at their current level," Lindenstrauss said. Lindenstrauss's comments came hours after Mazuz issued a ruling that the Likud Party leadership election campaign has officially been underway since at least August 7, 2005. That would mean that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon might have violated the Political Party Law's campaign funding limit by attending a $10,000-a-plate dinner in his honor in New York last September. The funding limit for foreign contributors according to the Political Parties Law is $7,894 per family. Mazuz's ruling contradicted an opinion written on October 23 by Eitan Haberman, the Likud's legal adviser. Haberman wrote that according to the law, the restrictions on campaign funding go into force nine months before the date of the primary election of the party leader. These nine months are defined as the "campaign period." According to the Likud Constitution, there is no set date for the primary election and it is up to the Likud Central Committee to set it before each primary on an ad hoc basis. Since the Central Committee has not yet set a date for the primary, the "election period" has not yet begun. Mazuz disagreed. In his opinion, the Likud Constitution also stipulates that the internal party primary must be held no later than six months before the national election. According to a decision handed down last year by the High Court of Justice, the latest possible date for the next national election is November 7, 2006. This means that even if the elections were to be held at the very last minute, the Likud primary would have to be held at least six months earlier (i.e. May 7, 2006) and the "campaign period" would begin no later than nine months before that (i.e. August 7, 2005.) The controversial dinner for Sharon was held in September 2005, during a triumphant visit to New York, in which he addressed the United Nations after the disengagement. New York Zionist activist Nina Rosenwald held a dinner in Sharon's honor for which she charged 15 couple $10,000 each and told them it was for the Prime Minister's upcoming campaign for the Likud party leadership. Reporters traveling with Sharon broke the story of the dinner and charged that the Prime Minister had violated the political funding restriction that applied to internal primary races. At the time, Sharon said he knew nothing about the money. "We know of no money that was asked for or collected or spoken about at that dinner," the Prime Minister's Office declared in an official statement in the wake of the accusations. According to his aides, Sharon was invited to the house of Rosenwald, an old friend, and remained there half an hour. After receiving Mazuz's opinion, Haberman said that it was the attorney general who had the last word.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town