Parties hope for tally errors that could yield extra mandate

Deadline for challenging election results expires today.

By DAN IZENBERG
April 4, 2006 00:22
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Although representatives of various political parties were scurrying around the offices of the Central Elections Committee on Monday desperately searching for mistakes in the preliminary voting results, no party had filed an appeal against it by press time, CEC spokesman Giora Pordes said Monday. The deadline for challenging the current election results published last week after all the ballots had been counted expires at 9 a.m. on Tuesday. If no new appeals are lodged by that time, the CEC will turn the current results into the final results and publish them officially in the government gazette, Reshumot, on Wednesday, April 5. The parties who sent representatives to the CEC, including Israel Beitenu and Shas, were looking for election results that would seem irrational in specific polling stations. For example, if Shinui had received a large number of votes in a haredi area of Bnei Brak, Shas could reasonably suspect that the figures had been erroneously copied into the protocol from the voting tally sheet, where polling station officials had originally recorded the party chosen in each ballot. This is what happened in five polling stations in the Arab sector, where votes that had gone to the United Arab List-Ta'al according to the voting tally sheet, were miscopied into the protocol as belonging to the Netz Party. Such an outcome was illogical in these polling stations since Netz advocated encouraging Arabs to leave Israel. In Hebrew, Netz was one letter above UAL-Ta'al in the list of parties that appeared in the protocol. In transferring the figures from the voting tally sheet to the protocol, officials had apparently missed the right party by one. According to reports on Monday, some of the parties, including Israel Beitenu and Shas, were only a few dozen votes short of another mandate. For these parties, the effort to uncover mistakes in the protocols was obviously worthwhile. But according to Pordes, there have always been mistakes in transferring voting results from the tally sheets to the protocol, but not until this year had such mistakes resulted in one party gaining a seat at the expense of another, as happened earlier this week when Labor lost one of its mandates to UAL-Ta'al.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN