'Pullout law can't be basis for Homesh arrests'

Judge orders release of girl who marched to settlement, questions territory's legal status.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
August 26, 2007 13:18
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Kfar Saba juvenile court on Sunday ordered the release of a girl who was arrested for marching to the former settlement of Homesh, ruling that the law governing the disengagement did not cover the prosecution of those who returned to the evacuated settlement, Army Radio reported. Police wanted to detain the girl on the grounds that she had violated the Disengagement Law, which prohibits citizens from staying on evacuated land. Judge David Gadol ruled, however, that suspects could not be brought to court based on the Disengagement Law, which was essentially aimed at ensuring the implementation of the pullout from Gaza. "The punitive section of the Disengagement Law has exhausted itself, and as of today it's impossible to bring suspects to court on this basis," Gadol wrote. He further claimed that the legal status of Homesh was in question, since it had not been handed over to any party after it was cleared out. "The subject raises an interesting question - and … we have to wonder what the legal status of the evacuated settlement of Homesh is," he wrote. "No one argues that on the eve of the evacuation, [Homesh] was considered, like the rest of the settlements in Judea and Samaria where Israelis were living, IDF-controlled territory. Once Homesh was evacuated, unlike with the Gaza settlements, it was not given to anyone."

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN