Q and A: Understanding latest setback

By
February 11, 2006 23:11
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

What is the condition that caused Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's setback? Acute occlusion of a branch of the superior mesenteric artery. This occurs suddenly and is usually due to a blood clot, most often caused by atherosclerosis in the vessel. Patients who are conscious when it happens generally complain of severe abdominal pain, and often writhe in agony and vomit. But in comatose patients, who feel no pain, there is no such early warning, and caretakers rely instead on other signs, such as a sudden drop in blood pressure. How is it treated? The survival of the intestine and the patient depends on immediate restoration of the blood supply to the intestines. Surgery is almost always performed immediately. Should Sharon have been receiving anti-clotting drugs (as he did after his first ischemic stroke) to prevent such an occurrence? Was it caused by lack of movement? Was there any negligence here? Anti-clotting drugs as a preventive measure should not have been given, according to medical experts, because they could have caused another hemorrhagic stroke in his brain. And even if they had been given, it would not have prevented such an acute condition in an atherosclerotic patient. Sharon is being moved constantly with a special electric bed and by his nurses to prevent bed sores and other complications. This type of clot was not due to a lack of movement of his limbs. Despite this setback, could Sharon still regain consciousness? Although it is not impossible that he will regain consciousness, the passing of each day that he remains in a coma reduces the chance of recovery and increases the risk of further complications.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN